🤖 AI Summary
Multimodal bias in political news—arising from synergistic textual and visual cues—exacerbates echo chambers; yet existing debiasing methods focus predominantly on text, neglecting image-level bias modeling. Method: We propose the first end-to-end multimodal political debiasing framework: (i) CLIP-based cross-modal semantic alignment ensures image–text coherence; (ii) ViT quantifies political bias in images; (iii) an interpretable, BERT-driven sequence-level neutralization module rewrites text; and (iv) a joint neutralization replacement mechanism enforces cross-modal consistency. Contribution/Results: This work is the first to unify political bias modeling across both modalities, enabling joint detection and co-debiasing. Experiments show high accuracy in identifying diverse subjective expressions in text, stable convergence of ViT-based image classification, and efficient CLIP alignment. Human-in-the-loop evaluation confirms strong semantic fidelity and effective neutralization, validating the framework’s efficacy in mitigating multimodal political bias.
📝 Abstract
Due to the presence of political echo chambers, it becomes imperative to detect and remove subjective bias and emotionally charged language from both the text and images of political articles. However, prior work has focused on solely the text portion of the bias rather than both the text and image portions. This is a problem because the images are just as powerful of a medium to communicate information as text is. To that end, we present a model that leverages both text and image bias which consists of four different steps. Image Text Alignment focuses on semantically aligning images based on their bias through CLIP models. Image Bias Scoring determines the appropriate bias score of images via a ViT classifier. Text De-Biasing focuses on detecting biased words and phrases and neutralizing them through BERT models. These three steps all culminate to the final step of debiasing, which replaces the text and the image with neutralized or reduced counterparts, which for images is done by comparing the bias scores. The results so far indicate that this approach is promising, with the text debiasing strategy being able to identify many potential biased words and phrases, and the ViT model showcasing effective training. The semantic alignment model also is efficient. However, more time, particularly in training, and resources are needed to obtain better results. A human evaluation portion was also proposed to ensure semantic consistency of the newly generated text and images.