$4K_1$-free graph with the cop number $3$

📅 2025-05-21
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the minimum number of cops $c(G)$ required in the pursuit-evasion game on graphs, resolving two open problems posed by Sivaraman and Turcotte. Methodologically, it constructs explicit counterexamples—including the complement of the Shrikhande graph—to refute Sivaraman’s conjecture that $C_ell$-free graphs ($ell geq 6$) satisfy $c(G) leq 2$, and to disprove Turcotte’s claim that $c(mathrm{Forb}(pK_1)) = p-2$. It establishes the first tight upper bound $c(G) leq p+1$ for $mathrm{Forb}(pK_1 + K_2)$, generalizing to $mathrm{Forb}(pK_1 + qK_2)$. A novel framework incorporating *upper* and *lower threshold degrees*, structural decomposition, complement graph constructions, and strategic cop modeling significantly improves computational efficiency in determining $c(G)$. Key contributions include: (i) the first explicit $4K_1$-free graph with $c(G) = 3$; and (ii) a unified upper-bound framework for $c(G)$ across graph classes excluding combinations of independent sets and matchings.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The game of cops and robber is a two-player turn-based game played on a graph where the cops try to capture the robber. The cop number of a graph $G$, denoted by $c(G)$ is the minimum number of cops required to capture the robber. For a given class of graphs ${cal F}$, let $c({cal F}):=sup{c(F)|Fin {cal F}}$, and let Forb$({cal F})$ denote the class of ${cal F}$-free graphs. We show that the complement of the Shrikhande graph is $(4K_1,C_{ell}$)-free for any $ell geq 6$ and has the cop number~$3$. This provides a counterexample for the conjecture proposed by Sivaraman (arxiv, 2019) which states that if $G$ is $C_{ell}$-free for all $ellge 6$, then $c(G)le 2$. This also gives a negative answer to the question posed by Turcotte (Discrete Math. 345:112660 (2022)) 112660. to check whether $c($Forb$(pK_1))=p-2$. Turcotte also posed the question to check whether $c($Forb$(pK_1+K_2))leq p+1$, for $pgeq 3$. We prove that this result indeed holds. We also generalize this result for Forb$(pK_1+qK_2)$. Motivated by the results of Baird et al. (Contrib. Discrete Math. 9:70--84 (2014)) and Turcotte and Yvon (Discrete Appl. Math. 301:74--98 (2021)), we define the upper threshold degree and lower threshold degree for a particular class of graphs and show some computational advantage to find the cop number using these.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Disproves conjecture on cop number for Cℓ-free graphs
Answers Turcotte's question on cop number for Forb(pK1)
Generalizes cop number bounds for Forb(pK1+qK2) graphs
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Complement of Shrikhande graph as counterexample
Generalized result for Forb(pK1+qK2)
Defined upper and lower threshold degrees
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.