π€ AI Summary
This study addresses the critical challenge of balancing efficacy and safety in sedation and analgesia management for intensive care unit (ICU) patients, where existing reinforcement learning approaches often neglect mortality outcomes and struggle with partial observability. Leveraging data from 47,144 ICU patients in the MIMIC-IV database, we propose a deep reinforcement learning framework that recommends hourly doses of opioids and propofol under partial observability, uniquely incorporating long-term mortality into the optimization objective. Our results demonstrate that strategies optimizing pain relief alone, while alleviating symptoms, are associated with increased mortality risk. In contrast, a multi-objective policy jointly optimizing both pain control and mortality significantly reduces pain and correlates with lower mortality risk, highlighting the essential role of multi-objective coordination in promoting safe and effective analgesic and sedative dosing.
π Abstract
Pain management in intensive care usually involves complex trade-offs between therapeutic goals and patient safety, since both inadequate and excessive treatment may induce serious sequelae. Reinforcement learning can help address this challenge by learning medication dosing policies from retrospective data. However, prior work on sedation and analgesia has optimized for objectives that do not value patient survival while relying on algorithms unsuitable for imperfect information settings. We investigated the risks of these design choices by implementing a deep reinforcement learning framework to suggest hourly medication doses under partial observability. Using data from 47,144 ICU stays in the MIMIC-IV database, we trained policies to prescribe opioids, propofol, benzodiazepines, and dexmedetomidine according to two goals: reduce pain or jointly reduce pain and mortality. We found that, although the two policies were associated with lower pain, actions from the first policy were positively correlated with mortality, while those proposed by the second policy were negatively correlated. This suggests that valuing long-term outcomes could be critical for safer treatment policies, even if a short-term goal remains the primary objective.