Enhancing Federated Survival Analysis through Peer-Driven Client Reputation in Healthcare

📅 2025-05-22
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Medical federated survival analysis faces critical challenges including strong inter-institutional data heterogeneity, unreliable client contributions, and the absence of long-term, auditable reputation mechanisms. Method: We propose a decentralized, privacy-preserving peer-based reputation mechanism. Our approach introduces a novel decoupled framework that separates reputation evaluation from model aggregation; incorporates differential privacy–protected assessment of client update quality; dynamically adjusts trust weights using an improved C-index–based utility metric; and enhances robustness via clustering-based noise filtering and peer feedback. Results: Experiments on the SEER dataset and synthetic survival data demonstrate that our method effectively suppresses interference from noisy or malicious clients. It achieves superior C-index stability and mean performance compared to baseline federated methods without reputation mechanisms, enabling high-accuracy, robust, and auditable federated survival modeling.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) holds great promise for digital health by enabling collaborative model training without compromising patient data privacy. However, heterogeneity across institutions, lack of sustained reputation, and unreliable contributions remain major challenges. In this paper, we propose a robust, peer-driven reputation mechanism for federated healthcare that employs a hybrid communication model to integrate decentralized peer feedback with clustering-based noise handling to enhance model aggregation. Crucially, our approach decouples the federated aggregation and reputation mechanisms by applying differential privacy to client-side model updates before sharing them for peer evaluation. This ensures sensitive information remains protected during reputation computation, while unaltered updates are sent to the server for global model training. Using the Cox Proportional Hazards model for survival analysis across multiple federated nodes, our framework addresses both data heterogeneity and reputation deficit by dynamically adjusting trust scores based on local performance improvements measured via the concordance index. Experimental evaluations on both synthetic datasets and the SEER dataset demonstrate that our method consistently achieves high and stable C-index values, effectively down-weighing noisy client updates and outperforming FL methods that lack a reputation system.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addressing data heterogeneity in federated healthcare learning
Improving client reputation for reliable model contributions
Ensuring privacy in peer-driven reputation mechanisms
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Peer-driven reputation mechanism for federated healthcare
Hybrid communication model with noise handling
Differential privacy for secure client updates
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.