🤖 AI Summary
Text-to-SQL systems frequently generate incorrect SQL queries on complex, real-world databases due to inherent ambiguity in natural language. To address this, we propose an interactive disambiguation framework that models SQL generation as probabilistic inference over multiple candidate queries. At each interaction step, the system dynamically selects the most discriminative clarification question—based on expected information gain—to progressively refine user intent. Our approach integrates probabilistic modeling, natural language processing, and interactive learning, thereby avoiding premature convergence common in single-step generation paradigms. Experiments demonstrate that our method substantially reduces ambiguity and significantly improves execution accuracy across multiple benchmarks, including Spider and CoSQL. The framework enhances both the robustness and practical applicability of semantic parsing in realistic database environments.
📝 Abstract
Relational databases are foundational to numerous domains, including business intelligence, scientific research, and enterprise systems. However, accessing and analyzing structured data often requires proficiency in SQL, which is a skill that many end users lack. With the development of Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology, the Text-to-SQL systems attempt to bridge this gap by translating natural language questions into executable SQL queries via an automated algorithm. Yet, when operating on complex real-world databases, the Text-to-SQL systems often suffer from ambiguity due to natural ambiguity in natural language queries. These ambiguities pose a significant challenge for existing Text-to-SQL translation systems, which tend to commit early to a potentially incorrect interpretation. To address this, we propose an interactive Text-to-SQL framework that models SQL generation as a probabilistic reasoning process over multiple candidate queries. Rather than producing a single deterministic output, our system maintains a distribution over possible SQL outputs and seeks to resolve uncertainty through user interaction. At each interaction step, the system selects a branching decision and formulates a clarification question aimed at disambiguating that aspect of the query. Crucially, we adopt a principled decision criterion based on Expected Information Gain to identify the clarification that will, in expectation, most reduce the uncertainty in the SQL distribution.