RePL: Pseudo-label Refinement for Semi-supervised LiDAR Semantic Segmentation

📅 2026-04-08
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenges of error propagation and confirmation bias caused by noisy pseudo-labels in semi-supervised LiDAR semantic segmentation. To mitigate these issues, we propose RePL, a pseudo-label refinement framework that leverages a mask reconstruction mechanism to identify and correct errors in pseudo-labels, integrated within a purpose-designed semi-supervised training strategy to enhance label quality. We provide theoretical guarantees for the effectiveness of RePL and demonstrate that its required conditions are readily satisfied in practice. Experimental results on the nuScenes-lidarseg and SemanticKITTI datasets show that RePL significantly improves pseudo-label quality and achieves state-of-the-art performance.

Technology Category

Machine Learning: Semi-Supervised LearningPlanning, Routing, and Scheduling: Replanning and Plan RepairSearch and Optimization: Learning to Search

Application Category

Search and Retrieval-Augmented AI: Web learning to rank, online learning, and counterfactual learning for rankingSemantics and Knowledge: Methods to enhance, augment, integrate or synergize semantic models such as knowledge graphs and LLMsEconomics, Online Markets and Human Computation: LLM based quality controls for crowd work
📝 Abstract
Semi-supervised learning for LiDAR semantic segmentation often suffers from error propagation and confirmation bias caused by noisy pseudo-labels. To tackle this chronic issue, we introduce RePL, a novel framework that enhances pseudo-label quality by identifying and correcting potential errors in pseudo-labels through masked reconstruction, along with a dedicated training strategy. We also provide a theoretical analysis demonstrating the condition under which the pseudo-label refinement is beneficial, and empirically confirm that the condition is mild and clearly met by RePL. Extensive evaluations on the nuScenes-lidarseg and SemanticKITTI datasets show that RePL improves pseudo-label quality a lot and, as a result, achieves the state of the art in LiDAR semantic segmentation.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

semi-supervised learning
LiDAR semantic segmentation
pseudo-labels
error propagation
confirmation bias
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

pseudo-label refinement
masked reconstruction
semi-supervised learning
LiDAR semantic segmentation
error correction
🔎 Similar Papers