🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the limitations of traditional ERP systems, which rely heavily on manual intervention for exception handling and cross-functional decision-making, suffer from rule-based automation lacking reasoning capabilities, and struggle with monolithic AI approaches that cannot effectively coordinate multi-domain tasks. To overcome these challenges, the authors propose a role-aligned multi-agent LLM architecture featuring a Planner–Executor–Reflector–Responder graph-driven orchestration framework that decouples generation from evaluation. The design incorporates a risk-tiered human-in-the-loop supervision mechanism and externalized scoring criteria, substantially reducing tool selection complexity and yielding auditable expert-system components. Evaluated on real-world ERP backends across end-to-end business processes—including scenario-specific tasks, cross-functional crisis responses, and 365-day simulations—the system significantly outperforms both rule-based RPA and unassisted baselines, achieving zero stockouts compared to hundreds of stockout incidents recorded under baseline conditions.
📝 Abstract
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems record transactions reliably but still delegate almost all operational decision-making to human specialists, because classical rule-based automation cannot reason about exceptions and monolithic AI assistants degrade when asked to coordinate across functional boundaries. This paper presents Agentic ERP, an expert-system architecture that combines role-aligned large-language-model (LLM) agents with a risk-tiered human-in-the-loop harness and a graph-based orchestrator to execute end-to-end business workflows on a production ERP backend. First, autonomous ERP operation is formulated as a constrained sequential-decision problem over a structured enterprise state, with a decomposition argument linking role-aligned agents to a measurable reduction in per-step tool-selection complexity. Second, a graph-based Planner--Executor--Reflector--Responder orchestration decouples generation from evaluation through externalised grading criteria and sprint contracts, packaging recent harness-engineering principles as inspectable expert-system artefacts. Third, the system is evaluated at three levels: a scenario-based task suite, a comprehensive comparison of six orchestration paradigms on cross-functional crisis tasks, and a 365-day agent-in-the-loop simulation against rule-based RPA and no-intervention baselines. Across these levels the proposed multi-agent method is significantly better than the baseline, and the system sustains a simulated year of operation with zero stockouts while the rule-based baseline accumulates hundreds under the same demand stream. The work shows that role-aligned LLM agents under human oversight can move an ERP system from passively recording transactions to actively executing operational decisions, and it provides a reference architecture and an evaluation protocol for autonomous enterprise resource planning.