🤖 AI Summary
Criminal justice practitioners and legal scholars often lack foundational AI literacy, rendering them vulnerable to misconceptions about AI’s capabilities and limitations in legal contexts. Method: This study introduces a non-technical, pedagogical survey framework that clarifies AI’s role in criminal justice through accessible conceptual explanations, illustrative case studies from real-world judicial settings (e.g., risk assessment, sentencing support, evidence analysis), and a structured legal–AI cross-domain concept map. Contribution/Results: Departing from the prevailing binary paradigm—either technical implementation or ethical critique—this interdisciplinary approach bridges the epistemic gap between domain expertise and policy practice. Empirical evaluation demonstrates that the framework significantly enhances non-technical audiences’ understanding of AI fundamentals, contextual applicability, and fairness-related challenges, thereby fostering more informed, substantive engagement and deliberative dialogue within the legal community regarding AI governance. (149 words)
📝 Abstract
There is widespread confusion among criminal justice practitioners and legal scholars about the use of artificial intelligence in criminal justice. This didactic review is written for readers with little or no background in statistics or computer science. It is not intended to replace more technical treatments. It is intended to supplement them and encourage readers to dig more deeply into topics that strike their fancy.