๐ค AI Summary
A prevalent yet long-overlooked issue in supervised low-light image enhancement (LLIE) is brightness mismatch between enhanced outputs and ground-truth images, leading to training bias. This paper is the first to systematically identify and analyze this phenomenon. We propose GT-mean lossโa principled extension of standard L1/L2 lossesโby probabilistically modeling the distribution of image mean intensities and enforcing explicit ground-truth mean constraints. The loss is plug-and-play: it integrates seamlessly into existing supervised frameworks without introducing additional parameters or measurable computational overhead, and remains compatible with mainstream LLIE methods. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks and base models demonstrate that GT-mean consistently improves PSNR and SSIM while effectively mitigating brightness mismatch. Our approach provides a simple, parameter-free, and broadly applicable brightness calibration solution for supervised LLIE.
๐ Abstract
Low-light image enhancement (LLIE) aims to improve the visual quality of images captured under poor lighting conditions. In supervised LLIE research, there exists a significant yet often overlooked inconsistency between the overall brightness of an enhanced image and its ground truth counterpart, referred to as brightness mismatch in this study. Brightness mismatch negatively impact supervised LLIE models by misleading model training. However, this issue is largely neglected in current research. In this context, we propose the GT-mean loss, a simple yet effective loss function directly modeling the mean values of images from a probabilistic perspective. The GT-mean loss is flexible, as it extends existing supervised LLIE loss functions into the GT-mean form with minimal additional computational costs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the incorporation of the GT-mean loss results in consistent performance improvements across various methods and datasets.