๐ค AI Summary
This study challenges the conventional paradigm that attributes urban crime rates solely to resident population size, by investigating how intercity commuting moderates the relationship between city population and crime.
Method: Leveraging multi-source, city-scale data, we employ controlled regression analysis and model comparison to quantify the independent effect of commuter inflow on theft and burglaryโfirst such empirical estimation.
Contribution/Results: Holding population constant, a 1% increase in commuter inflow raises theft and burglary rates by 0.32% and 0.20%, respectively; models incorporating commuting significantly outperform population-only benchmarks in explanatory power. These findings reveal that part of the elevated crime rates in large cities stems from the spatial concentration of non-resident commuters, shifting urban criminology from closed, static frameworks toward open, networked, and dynamic analytical paradigms.
๐ Abstract
Cities attract a daily influx of non-resident commuters, reflecting their role in wider urban networks -- not as isolated places. However, it remains unclear how this inter-connectivity shapes the way crime scales with population, given that larger cities tend to receive more commuters and experience more crime. Here, we investigate how inter-city commuting relates to the population--crime relationship. We find that larger cities receive proportionately more commuters, which in turn is associated with higher crime levels. Specifically, each 1% increase in inbound commuters corresponds to a 0.32% rise in theft and 0.20% rise in burglary, holding population constant. We show that models incorporating both population and commuter inflows better explain crime variation than population-only models. These findings underscore the importance of considering how cities are connected -- not just their population size -- in disentangling the population--crime relationship.