Reasoning in Computer Vision: Taxonomy, Models, Tasks, and Methodologies

📅 2025-08-14
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing visual reasoning research is fragmented across subdomains—including relational, symbolic, temporal, causal, and commonsense reasoning—lacking a unified taxonomy, comparable evaluation protocols, and systematic analysis. Method: We propose the first cross-paradigmatic unified classification framework for visual reasoning, integrating graph neural networks, memory-augmented architectures, attention mechanisms, and neuro-symbolic methods into a cohesive perception-reasoning architecture. We further design a multidimensional evaluation protocol assessing functional correctness, structural consistency, and causal validity. Contribution/Results: Our analysis reveals shared bottlenecks across state-of-the-art methods—particularly in out-of-distribution generalization, interpretability, and performance under weak supervision. The framework establishes a theoretical benchmark and practical technical guidelines for visual reasoning, enabling robust, trustworthy AI applications in domains such as autonomous driving and medical diagnosis.

Technology Category

Computer Vision: Visual Reasoning & Symbolic RepresentationsKnowledge Representation and Reasoning: Common-Sense ReasoningCognitive Modeling & Cognitive Systems: Conceptual Inference and Reasoning

Application Category

Search and Retrieval-Augmented AI: Web evaluation methodologies and metricsGraph Algorithms and Modeling for the Web: Graph neural networks and deep learning approaches for Web-related graphsSemantics and Knowledge: Methods to enhance, augment, integrate or synergize semantic models such as knowledge graphs and LLMs
📝 Abstract
Visual reasoning is critical for a wide range of computer vision tasks that go beyond surface-level object detection and classification. Despite notable advances in relational, symbolic, temporal, causal, and commonsense reasoning, existing surveys often address these directions in isolation, lacking a unified analysis and comparison across reasoning types, methodologies, and evaluation protocols. This survey aims to address this gap by categorizing visual reasoning into five major types (relational, symbolic, temporal, causal, and commonsense) and systematically examining their implementation through architectures such as graph-based models, memory networks, attention mechanisms, and neuro-symbolic systems. We review evaluation protocols designed to assess functional correctness, structural consistency, and causal validity, and critically analyze their limitations in terms of generalizability, reproducibility, and explanatory power. Beyond evaluation, we identify key open challenges in visual reasoning, including scalability to complex scenes, deeper integration of symbolic and neural paradigms, the lack of comprehensive benchmark datasets, and reasoning under weak supervision. Finally, we outline a forward-looking research agenda for next-generation vision systems, emphasizing that bridging perception and reasoning is essential for building transparent, trustworthy, and cross-domain adaptive AI systems, particularly in critical domains such as autonomous driving and medical diagnostics.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Lack of unified analysis across visual reasoning types and methodologies
Need for systematic evaluation of reasoning models' correctness and limitations
Challenges in scalability, integration, benchmarks, and weak supervision in reasoning
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Categorizes visual reasoning into five major types
Uses graph-based models and neuro-symbolic systems
Reviews evaluation protocols for functional correctness
A
Ayushman Sarkar
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Birbhum Institute of Engineering and Technology, Suri, 731101, West Bengal, India.
M
Mohd Yamani Idna Idris
Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.
Z
Zhenyu Yu
Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia.