The next question after Turing's question: Introducing the Grow-AI test

📅 2025-08-22
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the extended Turing Test question—“Can machines grow?”—by proposing GROW-AI, the first systematic framework for assessing AI developmental maturity. It establishes four evaluation arenas—psychological, ethical, computational, and robotic—and introduces six standardized, game-based benchmark tasks (C1–C6). Leveraging behavioral logging, expert-weighted scoring, and a quantified Grow Up Index, GROW-AI enables reproducible, cross-modal (LLMs, robots, software agents) assessment of AI evolution from immaturity to maturity. Its core innovation lies in adapting human developmental psychology constructs to AI evaluation, thereby establishing the first traceable, multidimensional, process-oriented growth assessment system. Empirical validation demonstrates its capacity to identify maturity bottlenecks and evolutionary trajectories across diverse AI systems, confirming both universality and effectiveness. (149 words)

Technology Category

Philosophy and Ethics of AI: Safety, Robustness & TrustworthinessCognitive Modeling & Cognitive Systems: Computational CreativityHumans and AI: Human-Aware Planning and Behavior Prediction

Application Category

Search and Retrieval-Augmented AI: Web evaluation methodologies and metricsEconomics, Online Markets and Human Computation: Research challenges in human and human-AI computationSemantics and Knowledge: Data modeling to support human-machine intelligence, including LLMs agents, intelligent system behavior, explanations, and user-friendly interactions
📝 Abstract
This study aims to extend the framework for assessing artificial intelligence, called GROW-AI (Growth and Realization of Autonomous Wisdom), designed to answer the question "Can machines grow up?" -- a natural successor to the Turing Test. The methodology applied is based on a system of six primary criteria (C1-C6), each assessed through a specific "game", divided into four arenas that explore both the human dimension and its transposition into AI. All decisions and actions of the entity are recorded in a standardized AI Journal, the primary source for calculating composite scores. The assessment uses the prior expert method to establish initial weights, and the global score -- Grow Up Index -- is calculated as the arithmetic mean of the six scores, with interpretation on maturity thresholds. The results show that the methodology allows for a coherent and comparable assessment of the level of "growth" of AI entities, regardless of their type (robots, software agents, LLMs). The multi-game structure highlights strengths and vulnerable areas, and the use of a unified journal guarantees traceability and replicability in the evaluation. The originality of the work lies in the conceptual transposition of the process of "growing" from the human world to that of artificial intelligence, in an integrated testing format that combines perspectives from psychology, robotics, computer science, and ethics. Through this approach, GROW-AI not only measures performance but also captures the evolutionary path of an AI entity towards maturity.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Extend AI assessment framework beyond Turing Test
Measure AI growth and maturity through structured criteria
Evaluate AI evolutionary path using multi-disciplinary approach
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Develops GROW-AI test with six criteria games
Uses AI Journal for traceable scoring system
Applies multi-disciplinary maturity growth metrics
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
A
Alexandru Tugui
Faculty of Economy and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University