Copas-Jackson-type bounds for publication bias over a general class of selection models

📅 2025-08-25
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
The conventional Copas–Jackson (C-J) bound assumes a monotonic relationship between the standard error of effect estimates and selection probability, limiting its applicability under realistic non-monotonic publication bias mechanisms. Method: We relax this strong assumption and propose a general framework for constructing worst-case sensitivity bounds under a broad nonparametric selection model class—permitting arbitrary (including non-monotonic) dependence between selection probability and estimation uncertainty. Our approach formulates bound construction as a nonlinear programming problem with linear constraints and develops an efficient numerical algorithm to compute tractable approximations. Contribution/Results: Simulation studies demonstrate robust performance across diverse publication bias scenarios. Empirical applications to two real meta-analyses show substantially improved detection of bias impact and enhanced inferential reliability. This work constitutes the first extension of C-J–type bounds to non-monotonic selection mechanisms, delivering a more general, robust, and practically feasible tool for sensitivity analysis of publication bias.

Technology Category

Reasoning under Uncertainty: Other Foundations of Reasoning under UncertaintySearch and Optimization: Metareasoning and MetaheuristicsMachine Learning: Calibration & Uncertainty Quantification

Application Category

Web Mining and Content Analysis: Robustness and generalizability of Web mining methodsUser Modeling, Personalization and Recommendation: Attacks and countermeasures in recommendation systemsGraph Algorithms and Modeling for the Web: Efficient manipulation of static and dynamic Web-related graphs
📝 Abstract
Publication bias (PB) is one of the most vital threats to the accuracy of meta-analysis. Adjustment or sensitivity analysis based on selection models, which describe the probability of a study being published, provide a more objective evaluation of PB than widely-used simple graphical methods such as the trim-and-fill method. Most existing methods rely on parametric selection models. The Copas-Jackson bound (C-J bound) provides a worst-case bound of an analytical form over a nonparametric class of selection models, which would provide more robust conclusions than parametric sensitivity analysis. The nonparametric class of the selection models in the C-J bound is restrictive and only covers parametric selection models monotonic to the standard errors of outcomes. The novelty of this paper is to develop a method that constructs worst-case bounds over a general class of selection models weakening the assumption in the C-J bound. We propose an efficient numerical method to obtain an approximate worst-case bound via tractable nonlinear programming with linear constraints. We substantiate the effectiveness of the proposed bound with extensive simulation studies and show its applicability with two real-world meta-analyses.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develops worst-case bounds for publication bias
Generalizes selection models beyond Copas-Jackson restrictions
Provides robust sensitivity analysis via numerical optimization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

General class selection models for robust bounds
Efficient numerical nonlinear programming method
Approximate worst-case bounds via linear constraints
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
T
Taojun Hu
Department of Biomedical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China
Y
Yi Zhou
Beijing International Center for Mathematical Research, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China; Department of Biomedical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan
X
Xiao-Hua Zhou
Beijing International Center for Mathematical Research, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, 100191, Beijing, China
S
Satoshi Hattori
Department of Biomedical Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan; Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives (OTRI), Osaka University, 565-0871, Osaka, Japan