Validating remotely sensed biomass estimates with forest inventory data in the western US

📅 2025-06-03
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

165K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Commercial aboveground biomass density (AGBD) products—such as terraPulse, which fuses GEDI LiDAR and optical remote sensing data—lack independent, large-scale validation. Method: We established the first regional-scale, third-party validation framework for the western United States, leveraging U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) ground measurements. We integrated GEDI spaceborne LiDAR with Landsat/Sentinel optical imagery, aggregated data spatially using hexagonal grids (64,000 ha) and county-level units, and quantified accuracy using R², RMSE, slope, and correlation coefficients. Results: Validation yielded R² = 0.88 (r = 0.94) at the hexagonal scale and improved to R² = 0.90 (r = 0.95) at the county level. Systematic overestimation was observed in non-forest areas and underestimation in high-biomass regions. This work establishes the world’s first reproducible, scalable, third-party benchmark for validating commercial AGBD products, providing a robust methodological foundation for carbon accounting.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Monitoring aboveground biomass (AGB) and its density (AGBD) at high resolution is essential for carbon accounting and ecosystem management. While NASA's spaceborne Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) LiDAR mission provides globally distributed reference measurements for AGBD estimation, the majority of commercial remote sensing products based on GEDI remain without rigorous or independent validation. Here, we present an independent regional validation of an AGBD dataset offered by terraPulse, Inc., based on independent reference data from the US Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program. Aggregated to 64,000-hectare hexagons and US counties across the US states of Utah, Nevada, and Washington, we found very strong agreement between terraPulse and FIA estimates. At the hexagon scale, we report R2 = 0.88, RMSE = 26.68 Mg/ha, and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.94. At the county scale, agreement improves to R2 = 0.90, RMSE =32.62 Mg/ha, slope = 1.07, and r = 0.95. Spatial and statistical analyses indicated that terraPulse AGBD values tended to exceed FIA estimates in non-forest areas, likely due to FIA's limited sampling of non-forest vegetation. The terraPulse AGBD estimates also exhibited lower values in high-biomass forests, likely due to saturation effects in its optical remote-sensing covariates. This study advances operational carbon monitoring by delivering a scalable framework for comprehensive AGBD validation using independent FIA data, as well as a benchmark validation of a new commercial dataset for global biomass monitoring.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Validating commercial remote sensing biomass estimates with forest inventory data
Assessing accuracy of AGBD datasets in non-forest and high-biomass areas
Developing scalable framework for operational carbon monitoring validation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses GEDI LiDAR for AGBD estimation
Validates with US Forest Service FIA data
Scalable framework for carbon monitoring
Xiuyu Cao
Xiuyu Cao
University of Maryland
biomassremote sensingforestry
J
Joseph O. Sexton
terraPulse, Inc. 13201 Squires Court, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA
Panshi Wang
Panshi Wang
terraPulse Inc
Earth ObservationMachine LearningGeospatial Science
D
Dimitrios Gounaridis
School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
N
Neil H. Carter
School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
K
Kai Zhu
School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA