CheckEmbed: Effective Verification of LLM Solutions to Open-Ended Tasks

📅 2024-06-04
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 6
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the challenge of efficiently verifying answer credibility for large language models (LLMs) on open-ended tasks (e.g., summarization, knowledge extraction), this paper proposes a lightweight, answer-level embedding-based automatic verification paradigm. Methodologically, it maps each full answer to a single high-quality text embedding—enabling fine-grained similarity comparison against reference ground truths—and introduces embedding heatmaps and interpretable summary metrics to form an end-to-end trustworthiness assessment framework. The approach leverages GPT Text Embedding Large, combined with similarity computation and threshold-driven decision-making. Evaluated on document analysis tasks, it significantly outperforms BERTScore and SelfCheckGPT in accuracy, inference cost, and runtime speed, achieving concurrent gains in both efficiency and reliability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing various domains, yet verifying their answers remains a significant challenge, especially for intricate open-ended tasks such as consolidation, summarization, and extraction of knowledge. In this work, we propose CheckEmbed: an accurate, scalable, and simple LLM verification approach. CheckEmbed is driven by a straightforward yet powerful idea: in order to compare LLM solutions to one another or to the ground-truth, compare their corresponding answer-level embeddings obtained with a model such as GPT Text Embedding Large. This reduces a complex textual answer to a single embedding, facilitating straightforward, fast, and meaningful verification. We develop a comprehensive verification pipeline implementing the CheckEmbed methodology. The CheckEmbed pipeline also comes with metrics for assessing the truthfulness of the LLM answers, such as embedding heatmaps and their summaries. We show how to use these metrics for deploying practical engines that decide whether an LLM answer is satisfactory or not. We apply the pipeline to real-world document analysis tasks, including term extraction and document summarization, showcasing significant improvements in accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and runtime performance compared to existing token-, sentence-, and fact-level schemes such as BERTScore or SelfCheckGPT.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Verifying LLM outputs for complex open-ended tasks
Overcoming accuracy and scalability limitations in verification
Generalizing verification framework beyond text to other modalities
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses modern embedding LLM models
Performs whole-answer level comparisons
Generalizes to multiple modalities
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Maciej Besta
Maciej Besta
ETH Zurich
Graph ComputationsEffective & Efficient AISparse ComputationsHigh-Performance Computing
L
Lorenzo Paleari
ETH Zurich
A
Aleš Kubíček
ETH Zurich
P
Piotr Nyczyk
Cledar
R
Robert Gerstenberger
ETH Zurich
P
Patrick Iff
ETH Zurich
T
Tomasz Lehmann
Cledar
H
H. Niewiadomski
Cledar
Torsten Hoefler
Torsten Hoefler
Professor of Computer Science at ETH Zurich
High Performance ComputingDeep LearningNetworkingMessage Passing InterfaceParallel and Distributed Computing