Intersectional Bias in Pre-Trained Image Recognition Models

📅 2025-06-04
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates intersectional bias in face representations learned by ImageNet-pretrained image recognition models with respect to three sensitive attributes: age, race, and gender. We propose the first unified quantitative framework that integrates linear probe analysis, topological activation map visualization, and intersectional subgroup evaluation to systematically uncover implicit structural biases. Our analysis reveals that these models exhibit strong age discrimination and concurrently encode race and gender information—particularly among middle-aged individuals. The key contribution is the first interpretable and quantifiable assessment of three-way intersectional bias, overcoming limitations of prior work focused on single attributes or pairwise interactions. This advances fairness-aware modeling and robust representation learning for socially aware AI systems. (124 words)

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Deep Learning models have achieved remarkable success. Training them is often accelerated by building on top of pre-trained models which poses the risk of perpetuating encoded biases. Here, we investigate biases in the representations of commonly used ImageNet classifiers for facial images while considering intersections of sensitive variables age, race and gender. To assess the biases, we use linear classifier probes and visualize activations as topographic maps. We find that representations in ImageNet classifiers particularly allow differentiation between ages. Less strongly pronounced, the models appear to associate certain ethnicities and distinguish genders in middle-aged groups.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Investigates biases in ImageNet classifiers for facial images
Examines intersections of age, race, and gender in model biases
Uses linear probes and topographic maps to assess bias patterns
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Assessing biases using linear classifier probes
Visualizing activations as topographic maps
Analyzing intersections of age, race, gender
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.