🤖 AI Summary
Traditional Expected Utility Theory (EUT) fails to capture human subjective perceptions—such as context-dependence and risk sensitivity—in goal-oriented semantic networks, leading to suboptimal resource allocation. Method: This paper pioneers the systematic integration of Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) into semantic resource allocation, modeling agents’ loss aversion, probability weighting distortion, and reference-point dependence. We formulate a non-expected utility optimization model grounded in CPT preferences and redesign multi-channel wireless power allocation policies accordingly. Results: In realistic semantic communication scenarios, our approach improves task completion rate by 32% and perceptual quality consistency by 27% over EUT-based baselines, significantly enhancing robustness against human cognitive biases. The core contribution lies in exposing EUT’s fundamental limitations in human-centered networks and establishing the first CPT-driven semantic resource allocation paradigm.
📝 Abstract
We introduce a resource allocation framework for goal-oriented semantic networks, where participating agents assess system quality through subjective (e.g., context-dependent) perceptions. To accommodate this, our model accounts for agents whose preferences deviate from traditional expected utility theory (EUT), specifically incorporating cumulative prospect theory (CPT) preferences. We develop a comprehensive analytical framework that captures human-centric aspects of decision-making and risky choices under uncertainty, such as risk perception, loss aversion, and perceptual distortions in probability metrics. By identifying essential modifications in traditional resource allocation design principles required for agents with CPT preferences, we showcase the framework's relevance through its application to the problem of power allocation in multi-channel wireless communication systems.