What Users Value and Critique: Large-Scale Analysis of User Feedback on AI-Powered Mobile Apps

📅 2025-06-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing research lacks systematic empirical analysis of how users perceive and evaluate AI-powered mobile application functionalities, primarily due to the challenge of effectively analyzing massive volumes of unstructured app reviews. This paper introduces the first end-to-end, verifiable AI feedback analysis framework grounded in 894K Google Play reviews. We propose a multi-stage pipeline enabling fine-grained, co-occurrence-aware aspect–sentiment pair extraction and semantic clustering; pioneer an intra-review dual-polarity modeling mechanism capturing simultaneous positive and negative sentiments; and rigorously benchmark LLMs and prompting strategies via human-annotated ground truth. Our analysis extracts over one million aspect–sentiment pairs, clustered into 18 positive and 15 negative thematic categories. Key cross-domain drivers of user satisfaction and pain points include productivity enhancement, reliability, technical failures, pricing, and multilingual support.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered features have rapidly proliferated across mobile apps in various domains, including productivity, education, entertainment, and creativity. However, how users perceive, evaluate, and critique these AI features remains largely unexplored, primarily due to the overwhelming volume of user feedback. In this work, we present the first comprehensive, large-scale study of user feedback on AI-powered mobile apps, leveraging a curated dataset of 292 AI-driven apps across 14 categories with 894K AI-specific reviews from Google Play. We develop and validate a multi-stage analysis pipeline that begins with a human-labeled benchmark and systematically evaluates large language models (LLMs) and prompting strategies. Each stage, including review classification, aspect-sentiment extraction, and clustering, is validated for accuracy and consistency. Our pipeline enables scalable, high-precision analysis of user feedback, extracting over one million aspect-sentiment pairs clustered into 18 positive and 15 negative user topics. Our analysis reveals that users consistently focus on a narrow set of themes: positive comments emphasize productivity, reliability, and personalized assistance, while negative feedback highlights technical failures (e.g., scanning and recognition), pricing concerns, and limitations in language support. Our pipeline surfaces both satisfaction with one feature and frustration with another within the same review. These fine-grained, co-occurring sentiments are often missed by traditional approaches that treat positive and negative feedback in isolation or rely on coarse-grained analysis. To this end, our approach provides a more faithful reflection of the real-world user experiences with AI-powered apps. Category-aware analysis further uncovers both universal drivers of satisfaction and domain-specific frustrations.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyze user feedback on AI-powered mobile apps at scale
Identify key positive and negative themes in user reviews
Develop a pipeline for precise aspect-sentiment extraction and clustering
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Large-scale analysis of AI app user feedback
Multi-stage pipeline with LLM validation
Aspect-sentiment clustering for fine-grained insights
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
V
Vinaik Chhetri
Louisiana State University
Krishna Upadhyay
Krishna Upadhyay
PhD Student of Computer Science, Louisiana State University
software engineeringquantum software
A
A. B. Siddique
University of Kentucky
U
Umar Farooq
Louisiana State University