The Role of Target Update Frequencies in Q-Learning

📅 2026-02-03
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the long-standing lack of theoretical guidance for target update frequency (TUF) in Q-learning, which is typically tuned empirically and struggles to balance stability and efficiency. Viewing periodic target updates through the lens of approximate dynamic programming, the authors model the process as a nested optimization: an outer loop applying an inexact Bellman operator and an inner loop solved by a generic optimizer. They rigorously characterize, for the first time, the bias-variance trade-off induced by TUF, proving that fixed-frequency schedules are suboptimal and proposing instead an adaptive strategy where the update interval grows geometrically with training progress. Leveraging finite-time convergence analysis and stochastic gradient theory under asynchronous sampling, they derive an explicit form for the optimal TUF, eliminating the logarithmic sample complexity overhead inherent in fixed schedules and significantly enhancing Q-learning efficiency.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The target network update frequency (TUF) is a central stabilization mechanism in (deep) Q-learning. However, their selection remains poorly understood and is often treated merely as another tunable hyperparameter rather than as a principled design decision. This work provides a theoretical analysis of target fixing in tabular Q-learning through the lens of approximate dynamic programming. We formulate periodic target updates as a nested optimization scheme in which each outer iteration applies an inexact Bellman optimality operator, approximated by a generic inner loop optimizer. Rigorous theory yields a finite-time convergence analysis for the asynchronous sampling setting, specializing to stochastic gradient descent in the inner loop. Our results deliver an explicit characterization of the bias-variance trade-off induced by the target update period, showing how to optimally set this critical hyperparameter. We prove that constant target update schedules are suboptimal, incurring a logarithmic overhead in sample complexity that is entirely avoidable with adaptive schedules. Our analysis shows that the optimal target update frequency increases geometrically over the course of the learning process.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

target update frequency
Q-learning
hyperparameter selection
bias-variance trade-off
sample complexity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

target update frequency
Q-learning
approximate dynamic programming
bias-variance trade-off
adaptive scheduling
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.