🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of designing optimal assistance strategies for lower-limb exoskeletons given inter-individual variability. By constructing personalized musculoskeletal models based on BMI scaling, we employed OpenSim predictive simulations with ideal actuator modeling to systematically evaluate the metabolic and biomechanical effects of different joint combinations under 25 Nm and 50 Nm torque conditions. The research quantified the differential impacts of multi-joint synergistic assistance on gait and energy expenditure. Results demonstrate that combined hip-ankle assistance constitutes the optimal dual-actuator configuration, while full-joint assistance at 50 Nm reduces metabolic cost by up to 48.5%. These findings provide a critical theoretical foundation for the design of personalized control strategies in exoskeleton applications.
📝 Abstract
Lower-limb exoskeletons have made considerable progress in reducing energy expenditure during walking. However, designing optimal assistance strategies remains challenging, particularly given inter-individual variability in anthropometry and biomechanics. This study explores energy-optimal lower-limb joint-assistance strategies using predictive simulations with musculoskeletal models. Subject-specific models of six able-bodied subjects, with BMI-based muscle strength scaling, were used in predictive simulations to generate gait at self-selected walking speeds. Ideal actuators were incorporated to simulate various combinations of joint assistance at peak levels of 25 Nm and 50 Nm to examine the effects of assistance on gait and metabolic savings. The effects of each assistance configuration were assessed through cost of transport (COT), joint kinematics, muscle activations, assistive torques, and joint-level power metrics to characterize the biomechanical and energetic impacts of different assistance strategies. At 50 Nm, combined H+K+A (hip-knee-ankle) assistance resulted in the greatest mean COT reduction of 48.50 +/- 4.55%, with individual reductions ranging from 42.22% to 54.65% across the subjects. Among single-joint conditions, assisting the hip was most effective, reducing COT by 31.77 +/- 5.21%; the knee and ankle produced smaller, comparable reductions (19.17% and 17.02%). H+A (hip-ankle) assistance (44.60 +/- 7.08%) emerged as the most effective two-joint assistive configuration. Increasing the torque bound increased positive assistive power primarily at the hip and ankle, while knee assistance showed little sensitivity and delivered positive power near pre-swing. These results support H+A assistance as an efficient two-actuator target, while identifying the knee's atypical pre-swing power strategy as a candidate for targeted experimental validation.