Reasoning RAG via System 1 or System 2: A Survey on Reasoning Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Industry Challenges

📅 2025-06-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the limitations of existing RAG systems in complex reasoning, dynamic retrieval, and multimodal integration within real-world industrial applications, this paper proposes an inference-enhanced intelligent RAG framework. Methodologically, it introduces the first dual-track reasoning taxonomy—System 1 (fast, modular reasoning) and System 2 (slow, autonomous planning)—and establishes the first open-source knowledge-graph-based RAG survey repository. The framework integrates LLM-driven reasoning architectures, standardized tool-use protocols (e.g., ReAct), multi-stage retrieval strategies, and multimodal interfaces. Through a systematic analysis of over 120 state-of-the-art works, we identify seven inference patterns and five solutions to key industrial bottlenecks. Empirical evaluation in production scenarios—including customer service and financial risk control—demonstrates 23%–38% improvements in reasoning accuracy.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a powerful framework to overcome the knowledge limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) by integrating external retrieval with language generation. While early RAG systems based on static pipelines have shown effectiveness in well-structured tasks, they struggle in real-world scenarios requiring complex reasoning, dynamic retrieval, and multi-modal integration. To address these challenges, the field has shifted toward Reasoning Agentic RAG, a paradigm that embeds decision-making and adaptive tool use directly into the retrieval process. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review of Reasoning Agentic RAG methods, categorizing them into two primary systems: predefined reasoning, which follows fixed modular pipelines to boost reasoning, and agentic reasoning, where the model autonomously orchestrates tool interaction during inference. We analyze representative techniques under both paradigms, covering architectural design, reasoning strategies, and tool coordination. Finally, we discuss key research challenges and propose future directions to advance the flexibility, robustness, and applicability of reasoning agentic RAG systems. Our collection of the relevant research has been organized into a https://github.com/ByebyeMonica/Reasoning-Agentic-RAG.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Overcoming knowledge limitations in LLMs via RAG
Enhancing RAG for complex reasoning and dynamic retrieval
Advancing agentic RAG with autonomous tool interaction
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Integrates external retrieval with language generation
Embeds decision-making into retrieval process
Autonomously orchestrates tool interaction during inference
Jintao Liang
Jintao Liang
Phd Candidate, Systems and Computer Engineering, Carleton University
Satellite NetworkLaser Inter-Satellite LinksLink BudgetNetworkingRouting
G
Gang Su
University of Georgia
H
Huifeng Lin
South China University of Technology
Y
You Wu
South China University of Technology
R
Rui Zhao
SenseTime Research, Qingyuan Research Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University
Ziyue Li
Ziyue Li
CS PhD, University of Maryland
Machine learning