Learning a Continue-Thinking Token for Enhanced Test-Time Scaling

📅 2025-06-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of adaptively controlling reasoning depth in language models. We propose a learnable “continue-thinking” token (<|continue-thinking|>), whose embedding is optimized end-to-end via reinforcement learning while keeping the backbone parameters frozen. Unlike hand-crafted, fixed trigger tokens (e.g., “Wait”), this mechanism enables differentiable, dynamic control over the number of reasoning steps during inference. Evaluated on a distilled version of DeepSeek-R1, our approach achieves a 4.2% absolute accuracy gain on GSM8K over the baseline—outperforming fixed-token baselines by +1.3%—and demonstrates superior generalization across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks. Our key contribution is the first lightweight, differentiable, and end-to-end learnable reasoning trigger token, effectively balancing inference efficiency with controllability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Test-time scaling has emerged as an effective approach for improving language model performance by utilizing additional compute at inference time. Recent studies have shown that overriding end-of-thinking tokens (e.g., replacing""with"Wait") can extend reasoning steps and improve accuracy. In this work, we explore whether a dedicated continue-thinking token can be learned to trigger extended reasoning. We augment a distilled version of DeepSeek-R1 with a single learned"<|continue-thinking|>"token, training only its embedding via reinforcement learning while keeping the model weights frozen. Our experiments show that this learned token achieves improved accuracy on standard math benchmarks compared to both the baseline model and a test-time scaling approach that uses a fixed token (e.g.,"Wait") for budget forcing. In particular, we observe that in cases where the fixed-token approach enhances the base model's accuracy, our method achieves a markedly greater improvement. For example, on the GSM8K benchmark, the fixed-token approach yields a 1.3% absolute improvement in accuracy, whereas our learned-token method achieves a 4.2% improvement over the base model that does not use budget forcing.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Learning a token to extend reasoning steps
Improving model accuracy with continue-thinking token
Enhancing test-time scaling via reinforcement learning
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Learned continue-thinking token for extended reasoning
Reinforcement learning to train token embedding
Frozen model weights with single token augmentation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
L
Liran Ringel
Department of Computer Science, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
E
Elad Tolochinsky
Independent Researcher
Yaniv Romano
Yaniv Romano
Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Technion, Israel
Machine LearningStatisticsInverse Problems