Concepts for designing modern C++ interfaces for MPI

๐Ÿ“… 2025-06-17
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This paper identifies a fundamental semantic tension between MPI and modern C++โ€”manifesting in type safety, RAII-based object lifetime management, and communication buffer semantics (value semantics vs. raw pointers)โ€”and exposes multiple ambiguities and inconsistencies in the MPI standard. Method: We propose a concept-driven design paradigm grounded in C++20 Concepts, constraints, `std::span`, and move semantics, moving beyond syntactic wrapper libraries to formally model and verify semantic consistency across abstractions. Contribution/Results: Our analysis clarifies three core design conflicts, pinpoints several standard ambiguities, and establishes foundational design principles and a theoretical framework for high-performance, portable, and idiomatic C++ MPI bindings. The work provides both a rigorous conceptual foundation and a practical pathway toward community-standardized, semantically sound C++ MPI interfaces.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Since the C++ bindings were deleted in 2008, the Message Passing Interface (MPI) community has revived efforts in building high-level modern C++ interfaces. Such interfaces are either built to serve specific scientific application needs (with limited coverage to the underlying MPI functionalities), or as an exercise in general-purpose programming model building, with the hope that bespoke interfaces can be broadly adopted to construct a variety of distributed-memory scientific applications. However, with the advent of modern C++-based heterogeneous programming models, GPUs and widespread Machine Learning (ML) usage in contemporary scientific computing, the role of prospective community-standardized high-level C++ interfaces to MPI is evolving. The success of such an interface clearly will depend on providing robust abstractions and features adhering to the generic programming principles that underpin the C++ programming language, without compromising on either performance and portability, the core principles upon which MPI was founded. However, there is a tension between idiomatic C++ handling of types and lifetimes, and, MPI's loose interpretation of object lifetimes/ownership and insistence on maintaining global states. Instead of proposing"yet another"high-level C++ interface to MPI, overlooking or providing partial solutions to work around the key issues concerning the dissonance between MPI semantics and idiomatic C++, this paper focuses on the three fundamental aspects of a high-level interface: type system, object lifetimes and communication buffers, also identifying inconsistencies in the MPI specification. Presumptive solutions can be unrefined, and we hope the broader MPI and C++ communities will engage with us in productive exchange of ideas and concerns.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Designing modern C++ interfaces for MPI with robust abstractions
Resolving tension between C++ types/lifetimes and MPI semantics
Addressing type system, object lifetimes, and communication buffers
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Modern C++ interfaces for MPI
Type system and object lifetimes
Communication buffers optimization
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
C
C. N. Avans
Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, Tennessee, USA
Alfredo A. Correa
Alfredo A. Correa
Group Leader, Quantum Simulations Group, Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Visiting Scientist, Stanford
PhysicsCondensed Matter TheoryThermodynamicsEquations of StateProgramming
S
Sayan Ghosh
ACM member, USA
M
Matthias Schimek
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
Joseph Schuchart
Joseph Schuchart
Stony Brook University
High Performance ComputingComputer ScienceDistributed ComputingPerformance ToolsPGAS
Anthony Skjellum
Anthony Skjellum
Tennessee Technological University
High Performance ComputingCyberQuantum
E
E. Suggs
Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, Tennessee, USA
T
Tim Niklas Uhl
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany