🤖 AI Summary
Korean judicial rulings must undergo compliant de-identification prior to public release; however, existing methods struggle to simultaneously achieve scalability, high-precision PII recognition, and legal compliance. Challenges include ambiguous definitions of Korean PII, a lack of judicial-domain-specific annotated data, and no legally grounded classification framework. Method: We introduce the first Korean PII annotation dataset specifically designed for judicial judgments; establish a law-aligned, systematic PII taxonomy; and propose an end-to-end deep neural framework integrating named entity recognition (NER), rule-enhanced post-processing, and explicit legal constraint modeling. Contribution/Results: Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on Korean judicial de-identification, significantly improving accuracy, processing efficiency, and regulatory adherence. It establishes a scalable, verifiable technical paradigm for privacy-preserving publication of judicial texts.
📝 Abstract
To ensure a balance between open access to justice and personal data protection, the South Korean judiciary mandates the de-identification of court judgments before they can be publicly disclosed. However, the current de-identification process is inadequate for handling court judgments at scale while adhering to strict legal requirements. Additionally, the legal definitions and categorizations of personal identifiers are vague and not well-suited for technical solutions. To tackle these challenges, we propose a de-identification framework called Thunder-DeID, which aligns with relevant laws and practices. Specifically, we (i) construct and release the first Korean legal dataset containing annotated judgments along with corresponding lists of entity mentions, (ii) introduce a systematic categorization of Personally Identifiable Information (PII), and (iii) develop an end-to-end deep neural network (DNN)-based de-identification pipeline. Our experimental results demonstrate that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance in the de-identification of court judgments.