🤖 AI Summary
Existing Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT) relies on interval approximations over lattices, limiting its ability to capture fine-grained semantic fixed points in nonmonotonic reasoning and rendering it inadequate for several simple yet critical cases. To address this, we introduce the notion of *generalized approximation spaces*, transcending the traditional lattice-based interval structure by supporting hierarchical organization and cross-space mappings. Grounded in lattice theory, fixed-point theory, and abstract interpretation, we develop a more expressive and broadly applicable AFT semantic framework. Our model rigorously characterizes entailment relationships among major nonmonotonic semantics—including Kripke–Kleene, well-founded, and stable semantics—and significantly enhances modeling capability for cases beyond the scope of classical AFT. This advances the meta-theoretical foundations of logic programming and answer-set programming, offering greater expressiveness and conceptual robustness.
📝 Abstract
Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT) is a powerful theory covering various semantics of non-monotonic reasoning formalisms in knowledge representation such as Logic Programming and Answer Set Programming. Many semantics of such non-monotonic formalisms can be characterized as suitable fixpoints of a non-monotonic operator on a suitable lattice. Instead of working on the original lattice, AFT operates on intervals in such lattice to approximate or construct the fixpoints of interest. While AFT has been applied successfully across a broad range of non-monotonic reasoning formalisms, it is confronted by its limitations in other, relatively simple, examples. In this paper, we overcome those limitations by extending consistent AFT to deal with approximations that are more refined than intervals. Therefore, we introduce a more general notion of approximation spaces, showcase the improved expressiveness and investigate relations between different approximation spaces.