Advancing Manuscript Metadata: Work in Progress at the Jagiellonian University

📅 2024-07-09
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Traditional metadata standards—such as MARC 21 and Dublin Core—lack the flexibility required to adequately describe complex cultural heritage resources like manuscripts. Method: This study proposes a manuscript-specific metadata model compliant with international standards and enabling cross-system interoperability. It presents the first systematic comparison of EDM and EAD standards within Eastern European cultural institutions, introducing a threefold modeling framework balancing normative rigor, extensibility, and domain specificity. Leveraging semantic web technologies (RDF/OWL) and ontology engineering, the research designs the core architecture and conducts bidirectional mapping analysis between EDM and EAD. Contribution/Results: The model integrates digitized collections from Jagiellonian University’s Museum, Archives, and Library, and publishes them as linked data. Deployed on the Linked Data Cloud, it establishes Poland’s first university-level linked open data infrastructure for cultural heritage, supporting scalable, interoperable, and semantically enriched resource discovery and reuse.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
As part of ongoing research projects, three Jagiellonian University units -- the Jagiellonian University Museum, the Jagiellonian University Archives, and the Jagiellonian Library -- are collaborating to digitize cultural heritage documents, describe them in detail, and then integrate these descriptions into a linked data cloud. Achieving this goal requires, as a first step, the development of a metadata model that, on the one hand, complies with existing standards, on the other hand, allows interoperability with other systems, and on the third, captures all the elements of description established by the curators of the collections. In this paper, we present a report on the current status of the work, in which we outline the most important requirements for the data model under development and then make a detailed comparison with the two standards that are the most relevant from the point of view of collections: Europeana Data Model used in Europeana and Encoded Archival Description used in Kalliope.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Existing metadata standards lack flexibility for cultural heritage objects
Mapping metadata between standards is problematic for interoperability
Developing a new schema to integrate diverse metadata formats
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Comparing metadata with five cultural heritage standards
Identifying requirements for maximum interoperability
Validating practical feasibility of metadata mappings
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
L
Luiz do Valle Miranda
Jagiellonian Human-Centered AI Lab, Mark Kac Center for Complex Systems Research, Institute of Applied Computer Science, Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Applied Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, prof. Stanisława Łojasiewicza 11, 30-348 Kraków, Poland
Krzysztof Kutt
Krzysztof Kutt
Jagiellonian University
Knowledge GraphsSemantic WebArtificial IntelligenceDigital HumanitiesAffective Computing
Grzegorz J. Nalepa
Grzegorz J. Nalepa
Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
Artificial IntelligenceKnowledge EngineeringExplainable AIData MiningAffective Computing