A JEPA Recipe for Tabular Foundation Models

📅 2026-09-21
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
研究解决了表格基础模型中JEPA架构的潜在项崩溃问题,通过调整价值头读取编码器字段及使用EMA差异的方法,提高了模型在分类和回归任务上的表现。
📝 Abstract
Tabular foundation models learn to predict cell values in context, whereas world-model self-supervision asks for prediction in representation space (LeCun, 2022; Assran et al., 2023). On a tabular foundation-model prior, the latent term of a joint-embedding predictive architecture (JEPA) collapsed in our earlier runs and took the encoder with it to a constant map. We report a recipe under which the latent term survives to convergence beside the value objective: the value head reads the encoder field rather than the predictor, and the target is an exponential moving average (EMA) difference. To bound its cost against the value-only arm, both arms train until a plateau rule stops them, with no fixed step budget. A fixed horizon had confounded a slowdown with a ceiling, since the value-only arm was still improving well past the usual budget. At convergence, in one run per arm, the JEPA arm trails the value-only arm across 147 real datasets, 32:70 wins to losses on classification (29:63 with one entry per dataset name) and 8:24 on regression, the margin small on classification and wider on regression, and the count leans the same way in each stratum and each benchmark. The JEPA arm (jepa) needs 1.42 times as many steps as the value-only arm (ds), and 1.66 times its wall-clock, to reach its plateau.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Tabular Foundation Models
Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA)
Latent Term
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

joint-embedding predictive architecture
exponential moving average
value head
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
Mingyu Jeon
Modulabs, Seoul, Republic of Korea
S
Suwan Cho
Modulabs, Seoul, Republic of Korea
J
Jae Young Suh
Modulabs, Seoul, Republic of Korea