Cluster-Randomized Trials with Cross-Cluster Interference

📅 2023-10-28
📈 Citations: 3
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

266K/year
🤖 AI Summary
In cluster-randomized trials, cross-cluster interference is often ignored—especially when units exhibit irregular spatial distributions and cluster boundaries are ill-defined—leading to systematic bias in causal effect estimation. Method: We formally characterize the bias–variance trade-off under cross-cluster interference and propose a “boundary-unit exclusion” truncation estimator that mitigates interference by leveraging neighborhood homogeneity. We further establish interference-robust theoretical guarantees for k-medoids clustering. Contribution/Results: Our approach significantly reduces asymptotic bias while keeping variance inflation bounded. We derive an optimal cluster-number selection criterion grounded in this bias–variance analysis. Crucially, the method requires no prior knowledge of community structure, thereby enhancing both estimation consistency and practical applicability in real-world settings with ambiguous clustering.
📝 Abstract
The literature on cluster-randomized trials typically assumes no interference across clusters. This may be implausible when units are irregularly distributed in space without well-separated communities, in which case clusters may not represent significant geographic, social, or economic divisions. In this paper, we develop methods for reducing bias due to cross-cluster interference. First, we propose an estimation strategy that excludes units not surrounded by clusters assigned to the same treatment arm. We show that this substantially reduces asymptotic bias relative to conventional difference-in-means estimators without substantial cost to variance. Second, we formally establish a bias-variance trade-off in the choice of clusters: constructing fewer, larger clusters reduces bias due to interference but increases variance. We provide a rule for choosing the number of clusters to balance the asymptotic orders of the bias and variance of our estimator. Finally, we consider unsupervised learning for cluster construction and provide theoretical guarantees for $k$-medoids.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addresses bias from cross-cluster interference in trials
Proposes estimation strategy excluding units near different treatments
Balances bias-variance trade-off in cluster size selection
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Excludes units near different treatment arms
Balances bias-variance via cluster size choice
Uses k-medoids for unsupervised cluster construction
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.