🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the weak theoretical foundation of optimization for regularized Deep Matrix Factorization (DMF). We systematically characterize the geometric structure of its nonconvex loss landscape via algebraic derivation and nonconvex optimization analysis. Specifically, we derive a closed-form characterization of all critical points and establish necessary and sufficient conditions for each to be either a local minimum or a strict saddle point. Building on this, we prove that gradient descent converges almost surely to a local minimum. Combining theoretical analysis with numerical visualization, we empirically validate the structural properties of the loss landscape across diverse hyperparameter configurations and data regimes, thereby elucidating the essential mechanisms underlying optimization dynamics. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive theoretical explanation for the trainability of DMF, filling a fundamental gap in the optimization theory of deep matrix factorization.
📝 Abstract
Despite its wide range of applications across various domains, the optimization foundations of deep matrix factorization (DMF) remain largely open. In this work, we aim to fill this gap by conducting a comprehensive study of the loss landscape of the regularized DMF problem. Toward this goal, we first provide a closed-form expression of all critical points. Building on this, we establish precise conditions under which a critical point is a local minimizer, a global minimizer, a strict saddle point, or a non-strict saddle point. Leveraging these results, we derive a necessary and sufficient condition under which each critical point is either a local minimizer or a strict saddle point. This provides insights into why gradient-based methods almost always converge to a local minimizer of the regularized DMF problem. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments to visualize its loss landscape under different settings to support our theory.