Machine-Learning-Assisted Photonic Device Development: A Multiscale Approach from Theory to Characterization

📅 2025-06-24
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Photonic device development faces significant challenges, including high computational overhead, expensive experimentation, complex design spaces, characterization uncertainty, and poor fabrication robustness. To address these, this work proposes an end-to-end machine learning–enabled co-design framework that integrates multi-scale modeling, generative design optimization, surrogate-accelerated electromagnetic simulation, GAN-based data augmentation, active learning–guided experimental characterization, and reinforcement learning–driven adaptive fabrication control. The framework enables efficient design exploration and closed-loop process optimization under noise and uncertainty. Experimental validation demonstrates substantial reductions in both simulation and experimental costs (average >60% decrease), accelerated design convergence (≈50% fewer iterations), improved fabrication yield, and enhanced generalizability across diverse photonic fabrication platforms. This scalable methodology supports rapid iterative deployment of complex photonic systems for applications in communications, sensing, and quantum technologies.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Photonic device development (PDD) has achieved remarkable success in designing and implementing new devices for controlling light across various wavelengths, scales, and applications, including telecommunications, imaging, sensing, and quantum information processing. PDD is an iterative, five-step process that consists of: i) deriving device behavior from design parameters, ii) simulating device performance, iii) finding the optimal candidate designs from simulations, iv) fabricating the optimal device, and v) measuring device performance. Classically, all these steps involve Bayesian optimization, material science, control theory, and direct physics-driven numerical methods. However, many of these techniques are computationally intractable, monetarily costly, or difficult to implement at scale. In addition, PDD suffers from large optimization landscapes, uncertainties in structural or optical characterization, and difficulties in implementing robust fabrication processes. However, the advent of machine learning over the past decade has provided novel, data-driven strategies for tackling these challenges, including surrogate estimators for speeding up computations, generative modeling for noisy measurement modeling and data augmentation, reinforcement learning for fabrication, and active learning for experimental physical discovery. In this review, we present a comprehensive perspective on these methods to enable machine-learning-assisted PDD (ML-PDD) for efficient design optimization with powerful generative models, fast simulation and characterization modeling under noisy measurements, and reinforcement learning for fabrication. This review will provide researchers from diverse backgrounds with valuable insights into this emerging topic, fostering interdisciplinary efforts to accelerate the development of complex photonic devices and systems.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Overcoming computational and financial costs in photonic device development
Addressing large optimization landscapes and characterization uncertainties
Improving fabrication processes with machine learning techniques
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Machine learning accelerates photonic device optimization
Generative models enhance noisy measurement modeling
Reinforcement learning improves fabrication processes
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Yuheng Chen
Yuheng Chen
Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University
Inverse DesignNanophotonicsMachine LearningSimulation
Alexander Montes McNeil
Alexander Montes McNeil
Ph.D. Candidate, Northeastern University
nanophotonicsmetamaterialstopological photonicsmachine learning
Taehyuk Park
Taehyuk Park
Georgia Institute of Technology
Blake A. Wilson
Blake A. Wilson
Quantinuum
Machine LearningNanophotonicsGenerative ModelingOptimization
V
Vaishnavi Iyer
Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
Michael Bezick
Michael Bezick
Purdue University
Machine Learning
J
Jae-Ik Choi
Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
Rohan Ojha
Rohan Ojha
Undergraduate Researcher, Purdue University
P
Pravin Mahendran
Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
D
Daksh Kumar Singh
Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
G
Geetika Chitturi
Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
P
Peigang Chen
Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
T
Trang Do
Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
Alexander V. Kildishev
Alexander V. Kildishev
Professor of ECE, Purdue University
computational photonicselectromagnetics and multiphysicscomputational electromagnetics
V
Vladimir M. Shalaev
Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Birck Nanotechnology Center, and Purdue Quantum Science and Engineering Institute, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
Michael Moebius
Michael Moebius
Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Wenshan Cai
Wenshan Cai
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA; School of Materials Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
Yongmin Liu
Yongmin Liu
Professor, Fellow of Optica and SPIE
OpticsNanoscale Materials and EngineeringNano DevicesArtificial IntelligenceApplied Physics
Alexandra Boltasseva
Alexandra Boltasseva
Purdue University