Test-time Scaling Techniques in Theoretical Physics -- A Comparison of Methods on the TPBench Dataset

📅 2025-06-25
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates the generalization capability of test-time scaling (TTS) for theoretical physics reasoning and analyzes its differential applicability compared to mathematical reasoning tasks (e.g., AIME). Addressing the structured, domain-specific nature of physics problems, we propose a symbolic weak verification framework: during parallel sampling, it incorporates stepwise, physics-law-guided symbolic validation to enhance reasoning consistency and reliability. We systematically evaluate mainstream TTS methods on TPBench—a newly constructed benchmark for theoretical physics—and demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms existing baselines. Cross-domain validation on AIME further confirms its transferability. Our core contribution is the first integration of structure-aware symbolic verification into the TTS paradigm, yielding an interpretable and robust reasoning enhancement pathway tailored to scientific reasoning tasks.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities in complex reasoning, and test-time scaling techniques can enhance their performance with comparably low cost. Many of these methods have been developed and evaluated on mathematical reasoning benchmarks such as AIME. This paper investigates whether the lessons learned from these benchmarks generalize to the domain of advanced theoretical physics. We evaluate a range of common test-time scaling methods on the TPBench physics dataset and compare their effectiveness with results on AIME. To better leverage the structure of physics problems, we develop a novel, symbolic weak-verifier framework to improve parallel scaling results. Our empirical results demonstrate that this method significantly outperforms existing test-time scaling approaches on TPBench. We also evaluate our method on AIME, confirming its effectiveness in solving advanced mathematical problems. Our findings highlight the power of step-wise symbolic verification for tackling complex scientific problems.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating test-time scaling methods on physics dataset TPBench
Developing symbolic weak-verifier for physics problem structure
Comparing effectiveness with mathematical benchmark AIME
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Evaluates test-time scaling on physics dataset
Introduces symbolic weak-verifier framework
Enhances performance with step-wise verification
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Z
Zhiqi Gao
Department of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison
T
Tianyi Li
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Yurii Kvasiuk
Yurii Kvasiuk
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Sai Chaitanya Tadepalli
Sai Chaitanya Tadepalli
Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington
M
Maja Rudolph
Data Science Institute (DSI), University of Wisconsin-Madison
D
Daniel J. H. Chung
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Frederic Sala
Frederic Sala
Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin
Data-centric AIMachine learningInformation theory
Moritz Münchmeyer
Moritz Münchmeyer
Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison
CosmologyMachine Learning