TUS-REC2024: A Challenge to Reconstruct 3D Freehand Ultrasound Without External Tracker

📅 2025-06-26
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenging problem of freehand 3D ultrasound reconstruction without external tracking devices. Methodologically, it introduces an end-to-end framework integrating recurrent neural networks, image-registration-driven voxel optimization, attention mechanisms, and physics-informed modeling for joint motion estimation and volumetric reconstruction. Key contributions include: (1) the first open-source benchmark dataset featuring ground-truth motion annotations and a multi-center acquisition protocol; (2) a unified, Dockerized evaluation framework supporting multi-dimensional assessment—encompassing geometric accuracy, physical plausibility, and clinical utility; and (3) empirical insights derived from a large-scale challenge involving 43 participating teams and 21 validated submissions, which identify long-sequence drift mitigation and cross-protocol generalization as critical bottlenecks. The benchmark establishes a reproducible foundation for advancing low-cost, portable 3D ultrasound imaging research.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Trackerless freehand ultrasound reconstruction aims to reconstruct 3D volumes from sequences of 2D ultrasound images without relying on external tracking systems, offering a low-cost, portable, and widely deployable alternative for volumetric imaging. However, it presents significant challenges, including accurate inter-frame motion estimation, minimisation of drift accumulation over long sequences, and generalisability across scanning protocols. The TUS-REC2024 Challenge was established to benchmark and accelerate progress in trackerless 3D ultrasound reconstruction by providing a publicly available dataset for the first time, along with a baseline model and evaluation framework. The Challenge attracted over 43 registered teams, of which 6 teams submitted 21 valid dockerized solutions. Submitted methods spanned a wide range of algorithmic approaches, including recurrent models, registration-driven volume refinement, attention, and physics-informed models. This paper presents an overview of the Challenge design, summarises the key characteristics of the dataset, provides a concise literature review, introduces the technical details of the underlying methodology working with tracked freehand ultrasound data, and offers a comparative analysis of submitted methods across multiple evaluation metrics. The results highlight both the progress and current limitations of state-of-the-art approaches in this domain, and inform directions for future research. The data, evaluation code, and baseline are publicly available to facilitate ongoing development and reproducibility. As a live and evolving benchmark, this Challenge is designed to be continuously developed and improved. The Challenge was held at MICCAI 2024 and will be organised again at MICCAI 2025, reflecting its growing impact and the sustained commitment to advancing this field.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Reconstruct 3D volumes from 2D ultrasound without trackers
Address motion estimation and drift in long sequences
Improve generalisability across scanning protocols
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Trackerless 3D ultrasound reconstruction from 2D images
Public dataset and baseline model for benchmarking
Diverse algorithmic approaches including attention models
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Q
Qi Li
UCL Hawkes Institute, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, U.K.
Shaheer U. Saeed
Shaheer U. Saeed
University College London
Machine LearningMedical Image ComputingReinforcement Learning
Y
Yuliang Huang
UCL Hawkes Institute, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, U.K.
M
Mingyuan Luo
National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China; Medical UltraSound Image Computing (MUSIC) Lab, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China; Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China
Zhongnuo Yan
Zhongnuo Yan
Shenzhen University
J
Jiongquan Chen
National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China; Medical UltraSound Image Computing (MUSIC) Lab, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China; Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China; Shenzhen RayShape Medical Technology Inc., Shenzhen, 518000, China
X
Xin Yang
National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China; Medical UltraSound Image Computing (MUSIC) Lab, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China; Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China
D
Dong Ni
National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China; Medical UltraSound Image Computing (MUSIC) Lab, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China; Marshall Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China
N
Nektarios Winter
DKFZ (German Cancer Research Center) Heidelberg, Germany
P
Phuc Nguyen
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA
L
Lucas Steinberger
Tufts University, USA
C
Caelan Haney
DKFZ (German Cancer Research Center) Heidelberg, Germany
Yuan Zhao
Yuan Zhao
Lanzhou University of Technology
time series forecasting
Mingjie Jiang
Mingjie Jiang
Hong Kong Centre for Cerebro-cardiovascular Health Engineering, Rm 1115-1119, Building 19W, Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong SAR, China
B
Bowen Ren
City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
SiYeoul Lee
SiYeoul Lee
Pusan National University
Deep LearningUltrasoundCTSegmentation3D Reconstruction
S
Seonho Kim
Department of Information Convergence Engineering, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea
M
MinKyung Seo
School of Biomedical Convergence Engineering, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea
MinWoo Kim
MinWoo Kim
Pusan National University
Medical imaging
Y
Yimeng Dou
Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin (UW) School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UW–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Z
Zhiwei Zhang
Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin (UW) School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53705, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UW–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Y
Yin Li
Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, UW School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53726, USA; Department of Computer Sciences, UW–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Tomy Varghese
Tomy Varghese
Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Ultrasound ImagingElastographyBiomedical Signal and Image ProcessingElasticity ImagingImage Guided Intervention
D
Dean C. Barratt
UCL Hawkes Institute, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, U.K.
Matthew J. Clarkson
Matthew J. Clarkson
Professor of Biomedical Engineering at University College London
Image Guided SurgeryMedical Image ComputingImage RegistrationComputer Vision