HydroAgent: Formalizing Forecaster Expertise into Skill-Orchestrated Flood Forecasting Workflows

📅 2026-07-27
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing AI-based flood forecasting methods struggle to formalize forecasters’ tacit expertise and lack explicit modeling of expert rules, review checkpoints, and workflow constraints. This work proposes HydroAgent, a novel framework that introduces a skill orchestration paradigm by embedding large language models (LLMs) into a model-driven forecasting pipeline. Explicit rules are encoded within modular skill components to constrain LLM reasoning, enabling the system to assist—rather than replace—human decision-making grounded in physical simulations. Experimental results across 129 flood events under five-fold cross-validation show Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.62 for peak discharge and 0.84 for flood volume. Scenario selection improved the Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) by 0.023–0.154, and in 13–14 out of 14 events, simulated outcomes fell within expert-defined prior ranges. Across five LLMs, judgment accuracy ranged from 40% to 80%.
📝 Abstract
Operational flood forecasting depends on tacit forecaster expertise that is difficult to formalize, audit, and transfer. Although artificial intelligence methods have advanced flood prediction and model-error correction, most existing studies have not explicitly represented the tacit expert rules, review checkpoints, and workflow constraints that connect model outputs to operational warning decisions. To address this issue, we propose HydroAgent, a skill-orchestrated agent framework that embeds Large Language Models (LLMs) into a model-driven flood forecasting workflow, where each skill encodes explicit rules to bound LLM reasoning. We validated its effectiveness using five state-of-the-art LLMs in the South Yamhill River basin. Our results demonstrate that prior judgment captures observed peak flow and flood volume within 5% tolerance in 10 and 11 out of 14 events, with 5-fold cross-validation over 129 events yielding Pearson correlations of 0.62 and 0.84. Building on a high-baseline scheme library (average KGE 0.890), the guided scheme selection further improves KGE by 0.023-0.154, with simulated peak flow and flood volume falling within the prior judgment ranges for 14 and 13 out of 14 events. All five tested LLMs successfully execute the HydroAgent workflow with comparable judgment accuracy (40%-80%), while showing moderate performance variation and substantial cost differences. HydroAgent does not aim to replace human forecasters; instead, it translates their tacit expertise into an auditable and reproducible workflow, streamlining analytical steps and supporting more informed decision-making. This skill-orchestrated paradigm demonstrates how explicit rule boundaries can guide language model reasoning to complement physically based simulation in next-generation flood forecasting.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

tacit expertise
flood forecasting
operational decision-making
workflow formalization
model-output interpretation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

skill-orchestrated agent
tacit expertise formalization
Large Language Models (LLMs)
flood forecasting workflow
rule-bounded reasoning
Q
Qingyi Yang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (D.I.C.A.), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano MI, Italy
S
Siqian Qiu
College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, 443002 Yichang, China
B
Bing Li
Independent Researcher, Shandong, 252300, China
X
Xu Shan
Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
J
Jia Feng
Qinhuangdao Hydrological Survey and Research Center of Hebei Province, Qinhuangdao, China
S
Shunan Zhou
School of Hydraulic Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, 116024 Dalian, Liaoning, China; Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, TU Dresden University of Technology, 01062 Dresden, Germany
X
Xudong Zhou
Institute of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
T
Tiantian Xing
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (D.I.C.A.), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano MI, Italy
J
Jiale Guo
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (D.I.C.A.), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano MI, Italy
Xiaoyi Dong
Xiaoyi Dong
Microsoft GenAI
Computer Vision
G
Gaoyu Liu
College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
X
Xiaohuan Liu
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (D.I.C.A.), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano MI, Italy
H
Haiqing Pu
Qinhuangdao Hydrological Survey and Research Center of Hebei Province, Qinhuangdao, China
Q
Qingwen Deng
School of Earth Science and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Xun Zhang
Xun Zhang
Assistant Professor, Southern University of Science and Technology
Operations managementAsymptotic statisticsOptimization algorithms
Zhongrun Xiang
Zhongrun Xiang
Ph.D. at the University of Iowa
HydroInformaticsMachine LearningDeep LearningArtificial IntelligenceWater Resources
Haiyang Qian
Haiyang Qian
Nexusera
AIOptimizationNetworking
Ying Yan
Ying Yan
Microsoft Research
Big Data Management
Y
Yongkang Xu
College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
N
Nuo Lei
College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
T
Tianlong Jia
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Water and Environment, Karlsruhe, Germany
B
Baoying Shan
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (D.I.C.A.), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano MI, Italy
C
Carlo De Michele
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (D.I.C.A.), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano MI, Italy