Almost polynomial factor inapproximability for parameterized k-clique

📅 2021-12-07
🏛️ Cybersecurity and Cyberforensics Conference
📈 Citations: 16
✨ Influential: 1
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates the FPT inapproximability of the parameterized $k$-clique problem. Assuming $W[1] eq ext{FPT}$, it proves that no FPT algorithm can achieve an approximation factor of $k^{1/H(k)}$, where $H(k)$ is any increasing computable function (e.g., $log^* k$), thereby ruling out—for the first time—FPT approximations with super-slowly growing factors such as $k^{1/log^* k}$. The proof introduces, for the first time in parameterized inapproximability, list decoding of Hadamard codes over large prime fields into the hardness framework. This significantly strengthens Lin’s (STOC 2021) constant-factor lower bound. Technically, the result integrates gap-ETH-based hardness, $W[1]$-hardness reductions, combinatorial coding theory, and fine-grained parameterized complexity analysis. It establishes near-polynomial FPT inapproximability for $k$-clique—i.e., no $k^{o(1)}$-factor FPT approximation unless $W[1] = ext{FPT}$—and introduces a novel paradigm for parameterized approximation theory.
📝 Abstract
The k-Clique problem is a canonical hard problem in parameterized complexity. In this paper, we study the parameterized complexity of approximating the k-Clique problem where an integer k and a graph G on n vertices are given as input, and the goal is to find a clique of size at least k/F(k) whenever the graph G has a clique of size k. When such an algorithm runs in time T(k) · poly(n) (i.e., FPT-time) for some computable function T, it is said to be an F(k)-FPT-approximation algorithm for the k-Clique problem. Although, the non-existence of an F(k)-FPT-approximation algorithm for any computable sublinear function F is known under gap-ETH [Chalermsook et al., FOCS 2017], it has remained a long standing open problem to prove the same inapproximability result under the more standard and weaker assumption, W[1]≠FPT. In a recent breakthrough, Lin [STOC 2021] ruled out constant factor (i.e., F(k) = O(1)) FPT-approximation algorithms under W[1]≠FPT. In this paper, we improve this inapproximability result (under the same assumption) to rule out every F(k) = k1/H(k) factor FPT-approximation algorithm for any increasing computable function H (for example H(k) = log* k). Our main technical contribution is introducing list decoding of Hadamard codes over large prime fields into the proof framework of Lin.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

FPT Algorithms
k-Clique Problem
Parameterized Approximation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

W[1]≠FPT assumption
Hadamard encoding decoding technique
approximation algorithm lower bound
🔎 Similar Papers
2024-09-21International Symposium on Algorithms and ComputationCitations: 2
Rutgers University | New York University
C
C. Karthik
Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University
S
Subhash Khot
Department of Computer Science, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University