🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the lack of quantitative characterization of approximation capabilities of neural operators in Sobolev norms, which are crucial for the well-posedness, stability, and generalization of partial differential equations (PDEs). We establish, for the first time, a functional analytic framework for neural operators in Sobolev spaces, rigorously proving that their $H^t$ approximation error can be explicitly controlled by the number of network parameters and deriving a power-law relationship between the error and parameter complexity. Using Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs), an $H^1$-norm loss, and high-fidelity numerical simulations, we achieve an $H^1$ test error as low as $10^{-7}$ (corresponding to a relative error of approximately $10^{-3}$) on the Burgers equation. The experimental results align closely with theoretical predictions, validating the efficacy of the proposed framework.
📝 Abstract
Neural operators have emerged as a powerful tool for learning mappings between infinite-dimensional function spaces. However, their approximation properties in Sobolev norms remain poorly quantified, even though these norms control both function values and derivatives and are the natural metrics for PDE well-posedness, stability, and generalization. We develop a functional-analytic framework for operator learning in Sobolev spaces and connect it to the numerical behavior of Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs) on a prototypical PDE. First, for a continuous nonlinear operator $\mathcal{G}: H^{s}(D)\to H^{t}(D')$ with $s > d/2$ and inputs restricted to a compact subset of $H^{s}(D)$, we prove that $\mathcal{G}$ can be uniformly approximated in $H^{t}$-norm by a neural operator with $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-d/s})$ trainable parameters. This yields an explicit complexity--error relation of the form $\|\mathcal{G}-\mathcal{G}_θ\|_{H^{t}} \lesssim C N^{-s/d}$. We then study the one-dimensional viscous Burgers solution operator $\mathcal{G}: u_{0}\mapsto u(\cdot,1)$ on a bounded $H^{1}$-ball and train FNOs with an $H^{1}$-loss. Across a sweep of model sizes, we obtain test $H^{1}$-errors down to $\mathcal{O}(10^{-7})$ and relative errors of order $10^{-3}$, with predictions accurately matching both solutions and spatial derivatives on held-out data. A log-log plot of Sobolev error versus parameter count exhibits an approximate power law $\|\mathcal{G}-\mathcal{G}_θ\|_{H^{1}} \approx C N^{-α}$ with empirical exponent $α\approx 1.4$, and long-horizon training reveals optimization instabilities in large FNOs, providing quantitative evidence that Sobolev-space approximation theory meaningfully predicts neural-operator scaling behavior.