🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of systematic best practices in large-scale Earth observation (EO) mapping, which often introduces errors during data preprocessing, model training, inference deployment, and validation, thereby compromising the reliability and scientific credibility of map products. To remedy this, we propose the first end-to-end best practice framework for EO mapping, encompassing the entire workflow from satellite data acquisition to operational map delivery. The framework integrates six core components: EO data infrastructure, preprocessing, machine learning dataset construction, uncertainty quantification, map production and dissemination, and independent validation. Emphasizing the interdependence of these stages, it embeds uncertainty quantification and independent validation as integral elements. By synergizing machine learning, distributed computing, and geospatial validation techniques, the framework establishes a reproducible and scalable mapping pipeline that substantially enhances the quality, consistency, and scientific rigor of EO-derived maps, supported by open-source resources to foster community adoption.
📝 Abstract
Recent years have seen a rapid expansion in the production of large-scale geospatial maps derived from Earth observation (EO) data, driven largely by advances in machine learning (ML) and large computing infrastructure. Although the barrier to generating such maps has dropped substantially, established best practices have yet to emerge, and design decisions made early in the pipeline can quietly propagate errors into the final product. Producing a technically sound and scientifically credible product remains challenging. Choices made at every stage are tightly coupled: preprocessing decisions shape the training signal, dataset design governs what the model can learn and how reliably its performance can be assessed, and global-scale inference introduces engineering challenges in compute and data access at scale, as well as artifact mitigation. Furthermore, uncertainty quantification and independent map validation each require dedicated methodological attention that is often underestimated. This paper presents a concise, end-to-end account of the recommended practices spanning the pipeline from satellite data to an operational map product. We organize the discussion around six interconnected themes: the EO data infrastructure landscape, data selection and preprocessing, ML dataset construction and model training, uncertainty quantification, map production and distribution, and validation. This paper is a condensed version of a longer guide that provides greater depth across all stages, accessible online at ghjuliasialelli.github.io/MLEO-Maps/.