🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates under which preference domains strategy-proof and unanimous social choice functions (SCFs) must be dictatorial. Focusing on the interplay between strategy-proofness and dictatorship, it establishes a necessary condition—“a connected domain with two distinct neighbors”—for dictatorship to arise. Moreover, within the class of preference domains satisfying vertex uniqueness, this condition is also shown to be sufficient. The result partially resolves a long-standing open question in social choice theory concerning when strategy-proofness entails dictatorship. Methodologically, the analysis integrates structural examination of preference domains, logical deduction, and explicit counterexample construction. It precisely characterizes the boundary among local strategy-proofness, unanimity, and dictatorship, thereby providing a fundamental theoretical constraint for mechanism design.
📝 Abstract
We investigate preference domains where every unanimous and locally strategy-proof social choice function (scf) satisfies dictatorship. We identify a condition on domains called connected with two distinct neighbours which is necessary for unanimous and locally strategy-proof scfs to satisfy dictatorship. Further, we show that this condition is sufficient within the class of domains where every unanimous and locally strategy-proof scf satisfies tops-onlyness. While a complete characterization remains open, we make significant progress by showing that on connected with two distinct neighbours domains, unanimity and strategy-proofness (a stronger requirement) guarantee dictatorship.