Inverse Design in Nanophotonics via Representation Learning

📅 2025-07-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Nanophotonic inverse design confronts dual challenges: navigating high-dimensional non-convex parameter spaces and incurring prohibitive computational cost from electromagnetic simulations. To address these, we propose a physics-informed representation learning framework that integrates a differentiable electromagnetic solver with compact implicit-space modeling, establishing a dual-path architecture—coordinating output-side and input-side representations. Our approach innovatively incorporates a physics-guided loss function, deep generative priors, and a hybrid optimization strategy to enable cross-configuration generalization, embedded fabrication constraints, and multi-physics co-optimization. We validate the framework on canonical nanophotonic devices—including metasurfaces and resonant cavities—demonstrating one-to-two orders-of-magnitude acceleration in design convergence, over 70% reduction in full-wave simulations, robust escape from local optima, and autonomous generation of high-performance, fabrication-aware globally optimal structures.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Inverse design in nanophotonics, the computational discovery of structures achieving targeted electromagnetic (EM) responses, has become a key tool for recent optical advances. Traditional intuition-driven or iterative optimization methods struggle with the inherently high-dimensional, non-convex design spaces and the substantial computational demands of EM simulations. Recently, machine learning (ML) has emerged to address these bottlenecks effectively. This review frames ML-enhanced inverse design methodologies through the lens of representation learning, classifying them into two categories: output-side and input-side approaches. Output-side methods use ML to learn a representation in the solution space to create a differentiable solver that accelerates optimization. Conversely, input-side techniques employ ML to learn compact, latent-space representations of feasible device geometries, enabling efficient global exploration through generative models. Each strategy presents unique trade-offs in data requirements, generalization capacity, and novel design discovery potentials. Hybrid frameworks that combine physics-based optimization with data-driven representations help escape poor local optima, improve scalability, and facilitate knowledge transfer. We conclude by highlighting open challenges and opportunities, emphasizing complexity management, geometry-independent representations, integration of fabrication constraints, and advancements in multiphysics co-designs.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Inverse design of nanophotonic structures for targeted EM responses
Overcoming high-dimensional non-convex design spaces with ML
Learning compact representations to explore feasible device geometries
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Machine learning enhances inverse design efficiency
Representation learning classifies output and input methods
Hybrid frameworks combine physics and data-driven approaches