A Practical SAFE-AI Framework for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Developing Medical Artificial Intelligence Ethics Policies

📅 2025-07-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

180K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) struggle to implement conventional medical AI ethics frameworks due to resource constraints and fast-paced development environments. Method: This paper proposes the Scalable Agile Framework for Ethics in AI (SAFE-AI), which deeply integrates ethical governance into agile software development. It introduces a novel scenario-based probabilistic analogy mapping mechanism for responsibility quantification, establishes testable metrics for fairness, transparency, and uncertainty management, and incorporates a lightweight ethics review model to support iterative development. Contribution/Results: Unlike static, compliance-centric approaches, SAFE-AI operationalizes and scales ethical practice through test-driven acceptance criteria, full-lifecycle monitoring, and business-aligned design. Empirical evaluation demonstrates its applicability in organizations lacking dedicated ethics teams, significantly enhancing model trustworthiness and stakeholder confidence.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) offers incredible possibilities for patient care, but raises significant ethical issues, such as the potential for bias. Powerful ethical frameworks exist to minimize these issues, but are often developed for academic or regulatory environments and tend to be comprehensive but overly prescriptive, making them difficult to operationalize within fast-paced, resource-constrained environments. We introduce the Scalable Agile Framework for Execution in AI (SAFE-AI) designed to balance ethical rigor with business priorities by embedding ethical oversight into standard Agile-based product development workflows. The framework emphasizes the early establishment of testable acceptance criteria, fairness metrics, and transparency metrics to manage model uncertainty, while also promoting continuous monitoring and re-evaluation of these metrics across the AI lifecycle. A core component of this framework are responsibility metrics using scenario-based probability analogy mapping designed to enhance transparency and stakeholder trust. This ensures that retraining or tuning activities are subject to lightweight but meaningful ethical review. By focusing on the minimum necessary requirements for responsible development, our framework offers a scalable, business-aligned approach to ethical AI suitable for organizations without dedicated ethics teams.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addressing ethical AI challenges for SMEs in medical applications
Balancing ethical rigor with business priorities in AI development
Providing scalable ethical oversight for resource-constrained organizations
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Embed ethical oversight into Agile workflows
Establish testable fairness and transparency metrics
Use scenario-based probability analogy mapping
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
I
Ion Nemteanu
Nemsee, LLC., Escondido, California
A
Adir Mancebo Jr.
The Data Science Alliance, San Diego, California
L
Leslie Joe
The Data Science Alliance, San Diego, California
R
Ryan Lopez
The Data Science Alliance, San Diego, California
P
Patricia Lopez
The Data Science Alliance, San Diego, California
W
Warren Woodrich Pettine
Mountain Biometrics, Inc. (doing business as Medical Timeseries Networks), Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Psychiatry, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah