🤖 AI Summary
The absence of effective invariants has impeded the equivalence testing of linear codes under the sum-rank metric. Method: This paper introduces a novel theoretical framework grounded in skew polynomials and division algebras. It defines the “kernel parameter” as a key invariant and integrates generalized ideal subspaces, centralizers, and center structures to algebraically characterize sum-rank isometries. Furthermore, it develops explicit computational algorithms for systematic equivalence testing, particularly for maximum sum-rank distance (MSRD) code families. Contribution/Results: The approach overcomes fundamental limitations of classical tools designed for Hamming or rank metrics. It successfully classifies the equivalence relations among several prominent MSRD code families—constituting the first equivalence-testing methodology for sum-rank codes that is both theoretically rigorous and computationally feasible. This work establishes a foundational tool for structural analysis and cryptographic applications of sum-rank codes.
📝 Abstract
The code equivalence problem is central in coding theory and cryptography. While classical invariants are effective for Hamming and rank metrics, the sum-rank metric, which unifies both, introduces new challenges. This paper introduces new invariants for sum-rank metric codes: generalised idealisers, the centraliser, the center, and a refined notion of linearity. These lead to the definition of nuclear parameters, inspired by those used in division algebra theory, where they are crucial for proving inequivalence. We also develop a computational framework based on skew polynomials, which is isometric to the classical matrix setting but enables explicit computation of nuclear parameters for known MSRD (Maximum Sum-Rank Distance) codes. This yields a new and effective method to study the code equivalence problem where traditional tools fall short. In fact, using nuclear parameters, we can study the equivalence among the largest families of known MSRD codes.