🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses model uncertainty under non-convex and non-cash-additive risk measures by developing a robust quasiconvex risk measurement framework in general Lp spaces. By introducing an uncertainty set and integrating acceptance sets with capital allocation rules, the work employs functional analysis, duality theory, and c-quasiconvex analysis to propose two complementary mechanisms for generating robust risk measures. The main contribution lies in overcoming the classical limitations of convexity and cash additivity, establishing penalty-type dual representations for robust quasiconvex and cash-subadditive risk measures. Furthermore, the paper demonstrates that the structure of uncertainty itself can induce quasiconvexity, thereby revealing the fundamental impact of ambiguity on capital allocation and asset acceptability.
📝 Abstract
This paper develops a unified framework for the robustification of risk measures beyond the classical convex and cash-additive setting. We consider general risk measures on Lp spaces and construct their robust counterparts through families of uncertainty sets that capture ambiguity. Two complementary mechanisms generate robust quasi-convex measures: in the first, quasi-convexity is inherited from the initial risk measure under convex uncertainty sets; in the second it comes from the quasi-convex (or c-quasi-convex) structure of the uncertainty sets themselves. Building on Cerreia-Vioglio et al. (2011); Frittelli and Maggis (2011), we derive dual (penalty-type) representations for robust quasi-convex and cash-subadditive risk measures, showing that the classical convex cash-additive case arises as a special instance. We further analyze acceptance families and capital allocation rules under robustification, highlighting how ambiguity affects acceptability and the distribution of capital.