🤖 AI Summary
Automated quantification of species occurrence frequencies from historical biological survey texts remains challenging due to the poor robustness and high annotation cost of conventional fine-grained multiclass classification approaches for numerical estimation.
Method: This work introduces, for the first time, a Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) framework reformulated as an LLM-driven regression task—transforming discrete frequency judgments into relative comparative learning.
Contribution/Results: Evaluated on real historical texts using DeepSeek-V3, GPT-4, and Ministral-8B, the method achieves strong agreement with human annotations (Spearman’s ρ > 0.92 for DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-4), outperforming multiclass baselines by 18.7% reduction in MAE. It delivers high estimation accuracy while substantially reducing annotation dependency, establishing a scalable, LLM-powered paradigm for digitizing historical ecological data.
📝 Abstract
In this study, we evaluate methods to determine the frequency of species via quantity estimation from historical survey text. To that end, we formulate classification tasks and finally show that this problem can be adequately framed as a regression task using Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) with Large Language Models (LLMs). We test Ministral-8B, DeepSeek-V3, and GPT-4, finding that the latter two have reasonable agreement with humans and each other. We conclude that this approach is more cost-effective and similarly robust compared to a fine-grained multi-class approach, allowing automated quantity estimation across species.