BenchRL-QAS: Benchmarking reinforcement learning algorithms for quantum architecture search

📅 2025-07-16
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

216K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Evaluating the suitability of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for quantum architecture search (QAS) remains challenging due to the lack of standardized, task-diverse benchmarks across noise regimes and qubit scales. Method: We introduce the first unified benchmark framework for QAS, covering variational quantum algorithms, quantum classification, and state preparation on 2–8 qubits under both noisy and noiseless conditions. We propose a weighted multi-objective ranking metric jointly optimizing accuracy, circuit depth, gate count, and computational efficiency. Experiments span nine representative RL agents—including value-based and policy-gradient methods—integrated with realistic noise simulation and differentiable quantum circuit design. Contribution/Results: Our empirical analysis validates the “no-free-lunch” theorem in QAS: no single RL algorithm dominates across all tasks and settings. RL-based quantum classifiers consistently outperform classical and heuristic baselines, yet performance is highly task-dependent. All code, benchmarks, and datasets are publicly released to enable reproducible quantum machine learning research.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We introduce BenchRL-QAS, a unified benchmarking framework for systematically evaluating reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in quantum architecture search (QAS) across diverse variational quantum algorithm tasks and system sizes ranging from 2- to 8-qubit. Our study benchmarks nine RL agents including both value-based and policy-gradient methods on representative quantum problems such as variational quantum eigensolver, variational quantum state diagonalization, quantum classification, and state preparation, spanning both noiseless and realistic noisy regimes. We propose a weighted ranking metric that balances accuracy, circuit depth, gate count, and computational efficiency, enabling fair and comprehensive comparison. Our results first reveal that RL-based quantum classifier outperforms baseline variational classifiers. Then we conclude that no single RL algorithm is universally optimal when considering a set of QAS tasks; algorithmic performance is highly context-dependent, varying with task structure, qubit count, and noise. This empirical finding provides strong evidence for the "no free lunch" principle in RL-based quantum circuit design and highlights the necessity of tailored algorithm selection and systematic benchmarking for advancing quantum circuit synthesis. This work represents the most comprehensive RL-QAS benchmarking effort to date, and BenchRL-QAS along with all experimental data are made publicly available to support reproducibility and future research https://github.com/azhar-ikhtiarudin/bench-rlqas.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating RL algorithms for quantum architecture search
Comparing performance across quantum tasks and system sizes
Assessing RL agent effectiveness in noisy and noiseless regimes
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Unified RL benchmarking for quantum architecture search
Weighted ranking metric for fair algorithm comparison
Publicly available framework supporting reproducibility
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.