🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the semantic fragmentation and lack of a unified theoretical foundation in fuzzy logic programming. Methodologically, it systematically extends Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT) to multi-valued—particularly fuzzy—logic programming frameworks, reconstructing both stable model and well-founded semantics within AFT to achieve their unified characterization. It introduces the notion of fuzzy stratification and refined semantic variants, thereby exposing intrinsic relationships among existing semantics. The approach integrates multi-valued logical modeling, semantic reconstruction, and formal fixed-point analysis. The contributions include: (i) a general, scalable semantic framework for uncertain reasoning grounded in AFT; (ii) systematic, precise, and theoretically integrated semantics for fuzzy logic programs; and (iii) the first rigorous migration of AFT from classical two-valued to fuzzy logic, bridging a critical theoretical gap in the field.
📝 Abstract
Fuzzy logic programming is an established approach for reasoning under uncertainty. Several semantics from classical, two-valued logic programming have been generalized to the case of fuzzy logic programs. In this paper, we show that two of the most prominent classical semantics, namely the stable model and the well-founded semantics, can be reconstructed within the general framework of approximation fixpoint theory (AFT). This not only widens the scope of AFT from two- to many-valued logics, but allows a wide range of existing AFT results to be applied to fuzzy logic programming. As first examples of such applications, we clarify the formal relationship between existing semantics, generalize the notion of stratification from classical to fuzzy logic programs, and devise "more precise" variants of the semantics.