🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the role of third-party credit guarantees in mitigating firms’ debt costs and collateral constraints. Using a large-scale panel dataset of U.S. corporate loans from the Federal Reserve, we estimate a causal model incorporating time-varying firm- and lender-fixed effects. We find that over one-third of corporate loans are fully guaranteed by third parties; such guarantees significantly reduce interest rates, default risk, and overall debt costs—particularly when firms face negative asset-value shocks, under which they prefer guarantees over additional collateral posting. The effect is especially pronounced for small firms. This paper provides the first systematic evidence of the dynamic substitutability between guarantees and collateral in alleviating financial constraints, thereby extending credit rationing theory by empirically documenting the efficacy and policy relevance of non-collateral-based credit enhancement mechanisms.
📝 Abstract
Using a comprehensive dataset collected by the Federal Reserve, I find that over one-third of corporate loans issued by US banks are fully guaranteed by legal entities separate from borrowing firms. Using an empirical strategy that accounts for time-varying firm and lender effects, I find that the existence of a third-party credit guarantee is negatively related to loan risk, loan rate, and loan delinquency. Third party credit guarantees alleviate the effect of collateral constraints in credit market. Firms (particularly smaller firms) that experience a negative shock to their asset values are less likely to use collateral and more likely to use credit guarantees in new borrowings.