Strategies to Manage Human Factors in Mixed Reality Pilot Training: A Survey

📅 2025-07-21
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses human factors challenges—including motion sickness, visual fatigue, and ergonomic discomfort—associated with mixed reality (MR) head-mounted displays in pilot training, and examines their potential impact on training efficacy and aviation safety. Methodologically, it innovatively integrates international civil aviation regulatory standards (e.g., EASA/FAA airworthiness and simulation certification requirements) into a human factors evaluation framework, combining systematic literature review with regulatory text analysis to assess multi-level mitigation strategies: hardware/software design improvements, physiological and psychological interventions, and operational procedure optimization. The study proposes a comprehensive MR flight training implementation framework that balances technical feasibility, pilot well-being, and regulatory compliance. It identifies actionable human factors management pathways, thereby providing theoretical foundations and policy support for developing industry-wide MR training guidelines, certification criteria, and evidence-based best practices.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Mixed Reality (MR) head mounted displays (HMDs) offer a promising alternative to traditional Flight Simulator Training Device (FSTD) displays, providing immersion, realism and cost efficiency. However, these technologies require management of human factors; cybersickness, visual fatigue and ergonomic strain. If left unmitigated, these effects can hinder pilot performance and training outcomes. For safety critical fields like aviation, addressing human factors challenges is crucial for MR's training potential. This survey systematically reviews the current literature identifying key human factors challenges in MR HMD use in pilot training and examines strategies to mitigate these barriers. Drawing on existing industry standards set by a leading aviation authority, the review adopts a regulatory perspective to explore hardware, software, ergonomic, physiological and psychological interventions improving pilot comfort, safety and training effectiveness in an MR FSTD. Additionally, it evaluates which of these interventions are most appropriate and viable for MR pilot training under existing aviation training regulations, ensuring that technical requirements and pilot wellbeing remain balanced. The findings yield significant insights for the human dimensions of aviation simulation training, highlighting how regulatory considerations shape the practicality of mitigation measures. These insights inform emerging MR aviation training guidelines and best practices, supporting MR's readiness to enhance aviation training.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Address human factors in MR pilot training
Mitigate cybersickness, visual fatigue, ergonomic strain
Balance technical requirements with pilot wellbeing
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

MR HMDs enhance pilot training with immersion
Mitigate cybersickness, fatigue via ergonomic interventions
Align strategies with aviation regulatory standards
A
Antonio Perez
School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
Avinash Singh
Avinash Singh
Honda Research Institute
RoboticsNavigationMotion Planning
Jonathan Mitchell
Jonathan Mitchell
Thales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
P
Philip Swadling
Thales, Sydney, NSW, Australia