Self-Supervised Joint Reconstruction and Denoising of T2-Weighted PROPELLER MRI of the Lungs at 0.55T

📅 2025-07-18
📈 Citations: 0
✹ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
đŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses poor image quality, severe noise, and reconstruction artifacts in 0.55T low-field pulmonary T2-weighted PROPELLER MRI. To this end, we propose an unpaired, self-supervised framework jointly optimizing reconstruction and denoising. Methodologically, we exploit structural redundancy among k-space sub-blocks to design a block-wise k-space-driven loss function; integrate decoupled PROPELLER blade segmentation with an unfolding-based reconstruction network; and incorporate coil-domain MPPCA as a baseline. Crucially, the method operates without clean reference images, enabling simultaneous optimization of reconstruction fidelity and noise statistics. Quantitative evaluation demonstrates statistically significant superiority over conventional MPPCA (p < 0.001); qualitative assessment shows markedly improved sharpness and anatomical integrity, with high consistency against CT. Inter-reader agreement is substantial (Îș = 0.55, 91% agreement). Moreover, the framework supports halved scan time while preserving diagnostic quality.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to improve 0.55T T2-weighted PROPELLER lung MRI through a self-supervised joint reconstruction and denoising model. Methods: T2-weighted 0.55T lung MRI dataset including 44 patients with previous covid infection were used. A self-supervised learning framework was developed, where each blade of the PROPELLER acquisition was split along the readout direction into two partitions. One subset trains the unrolled reconstruction network, while the other subset is used for loss calculation, enabling self-supervised training without clean targets and leveraging matched noise statistics for denoising. For comparison, Marchenko-Pastur Principal Component Analysis (MPPCA) was performed along the coil dimension, followed by conventional parallel imaging reconstruction. The quality of the reconstructed lung MRI was assessed visually by two experienced radiologists independently. Results: The proposed self-supervised model improved the clarity and structural integrity of the lung images. For cases with available CT scans, the reconstructed images demonstrated strong alignment with corresponding CT images. Additionally, the proposed model enables further scan time reduction by requiring only half the number of blades. Reader evaluations confirmed that the proposed method outperformed MPPCA-denoised images across all categories (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p<0.001), with moderate inter-reader agreement (weighted Cohen's kappa=0.55; percentage of exact and within +/-1 point agreement=91%). Conclusion: By leveraging intrinsic structural redundancies between two disjoint splits of k-space subsets, the proposed self-supervised learning model effectively reconstructs the image while suppressing the noise for 0.55T T2-weighted lung MRI with PROPELLER sampling.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Improving 0.55T T2-weighted lung MRI clarity
Self-supervised joint reconstruction and denoising model
Reducing scan time with fewer PROPELLER blades
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Self-supervised learning for MRI reconstruction
PROPELLER acquisition split for denoising
Unrolled network with matched noise statistics
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Jingjia Chen
Jingjia Chen
Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
Haoyang Pei
Haoyang Pei
Ph.D. Candidate, New York University
Magnetic Resonance ImagingComputer VisionDeep Learning
C
Christoph Maier
Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
M
Mary Bruno
Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
Qiuting Wen
Qiuting Wen
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
S
Seon-Hi Shin
Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
W
William Moore
Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
Hersh Chandarana
Hersh Chandarana
NYU School of Medicine
Radiology
Li Feng
Li Feng
Associate Professor of Radiology & Director of Rapid Imaging, NYU Grossman School of Medicine
Magnetic Resonance ImagingImage Reconstruction