๐ค AI Summary
This paper addresses the ontological ambiguity of state sovereignty: in practice, sovereignty claims frequently conflict, remain unasserted, or lack universal recognition, impeding standardized representation of international relations data. To resolve this, the study integrates ontological analysis, conceptual modeling, and philosophical logic to develop an extensible formal framework for sovereignty states. It rigorously distinguishes three dimensionsโ*de jure sovereignty*, *de facto sovereignty*, and *recognized sovereignty*โand specifies semantic rules for handling contradictions, incompleteness, and incremental sovereignty change. The framework establishes a foundational ontology for international affairs and, for the first time, systematically proposes a knowledge representation paradigm for sovereignty that accommodates complex political realities. It enables cross-national data integration, automated reasoning, and policy modeling, thereby delivering both methodological innovation and practical applicability.
๐ Abstract
This short paper is a primer on the nature of state sovereignty and the importance of claims about it. It also aims to reveal (merely reveal) a strategy for working with vague or contradictory data about which states, in fact, are sovereign. These goals together are intended to set the stage for applied work in ontology about international affairs.