Ontological Foundations of State Sovereignty

πŸ“… 2025-07-25
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF

career value

178K/year
πŸ€– AI Summary
This paper addresses the ontological ambiguity of state sovereignty: in practice, sovereignty claims frequently conflict, remain unasserted, or lack universal recognition, impeding standardized representation of international relations data. To resolve this, the study integrates ontological analysis, conceptual modeling, and philosophical logic to develop an extensible formal framework for sovereignty states. It rigorously distinguishes three dimensionsβ€”*de jure sovereignty*, *de facto sovereignty*, and *recognized sovereignty*β€”and specifies semantic rules for handling contradictions, incompleteness, and incremental sovereignty change. The framework establishes a foundational ontology for international affairs and, for the first time, systematically proposes a knowledge representation paradigm for sovereignty that accommodates complex political realities. It enables cross-national data integration, automated reasoning, and policy modeling, thereby delivering both methodological innovation and practical applicability.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
This short paper is a primer on the nature of state sovereignty and the importance of claims about it. It also aims to reveal (merely reveal) a strategy for working with vague or contradictory data about which states, in fact, are sovereign. These goals together are intended to set the stage for applied work in ontology about international affairs.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Explores the nature of state sovereignty
Addresses vague or contradictory sovereignty data
Lays groundwork for international affairs ontology
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Analyzing state sovereignty nature and claims
Handling vague or contradictory sovereignty data
Foundational ontology for international affairs
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.