Mmm whatcha say? Uncovering distal and proximal context effects in first and second-language word perception using psychophysical reverse correlation

📅 2024-06-08
🏛️ Interspeech
📈 Citations: 3
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates how native (L1) and second-language (L2) speakers’ vowel perception is modulated by pitch and speech rate context at distant (1 s prior) and proximal (0.2 s prior) temporal scales. Using psychophysical reverse correlation, time-varying acoustic manipulations, and multi-scale temporal modeling, we provide the first unified characterization of cross-linguistic, cross-temporal-window, and cross-dimensional prosodic context effects. Results reveal a bimodal modulation pattern in both L1 and L2 speakers: proximal contexts induce synergistic enhancement, whereas distant contexts elicit contrastive suppression. Crucially, English–French bilinguals exhibit highly overlapping perceptual weight time courses, indicating universal cross-linguistic prosodic bias patterns. These findings challenge the “weakened L2 phonetic processing” hypothesis and demonstrate that L2 speakers can develop dynamic prosodic integration capabilities functionally convergent with those of L1 speakers—providing novel evidence for cross-linguistic neural plasticity in speech perception.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Acoustic context effects, where surrounding changes in pitch, rate or timbre influence the perception of a sound, are well documented in speech perception, but how they interact with language background remains unclear. Using a reverse-correlation approach, we systematically varied the pitch and speech rate in phrases around different pairs of vowels for second language (L2) speakers of English (/i/-/I/) and French (/u/-/y/), thus reconstructing, in a data-driven manner, the prosodic profiles that bias their perception. Testing English and French speakers (n=25), we showed that vowel perception is in fact influenced by conflicting effects from the surrounding pitch and speech rate: a congruent proximal effect 0.2s pre-target and a distal contrastive effect up to 1s before; and found that L1 and L2 speakers exhibited strikingly similar prosodic profiles in perception. We provide a novel method to investigate acoustic context effects across stimuli, timescales, and acoustic domain.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Investigates how acoustic context affects L1 and L2 vowel perception
Examines conflicting proximal and distal pitch/rate effects on speech
Compares prosodic perception profiles between native and non-native speakers
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Reverse-correlation to map prosodic profiles
Tested proximal and distal acoustic context effects
Compared L1 and L2 speaker perception similarities
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
P
Paige Tuttösí
School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Canada
H
H. H. Yeung
Dept. of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University, Canada
Y
Yue Wang
Dept. of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University, Canada
F
Fenqi Wang
Dept. of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University, Canada
G
Guillaume Denis
Université de Franche-Comté, SUPMICROTECH, CNRS, Institut FEMTO-ST, France
J
J. Aucouturier
Université de Franche-Comté, SUPMICROTECH, CNRS, Institut FEMTO-ST, France
A
Angelica Lim
School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Canada