Consistency of Feature Attribution in Deep Learning Architectures for Multi-Omics

📅 2025-07-30
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

215K/year
🤖 AI Summary
In multi-omics deep learning, feature attribution results exhibit substantial sensitivity to model architecture and random weight initialization, undermining the consistency and robustness of critical biomolecule identification. This work systematically evaluates the stability of attribution methods—particularly SHAP—across multi-view deep learning models, revealing significant rank-order divergence across architectures and initialization seeds. To address this, we propose a robustness diagnostic framework that replaces single attribution outputs with subset-based modeling and clustering-quality assessment, quantifying the consistency of feature importance estimates. Experiments on benchmark multi-omics datasets demonstrate that our approach reliably identifies high-stability biomarker candidates, markedly improving the reproducibility and trustworthiness of interpretability analyses. By providing a principled, quantifiable measure of attribution robustness, the framework establishes a more reliable foundation for model-driven biological discovery.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Machine and deep learning have grown in popularity and use in biological research over the last decade but still present challenges in interpretability of the fitted model. The development and use of metrics to determine features driving predictions and increase model interpretability continues to be an open area of research. We investigate the use of Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) on a multi-view deep learning model applied to multi-omics data for the purposes of identifying biomolecules of interest. Rankings of features via these attribution methods are compared across various architectures to evaluate consistency of the method. We perform multiple computational experiments to assess the robustness of SHAP and investigate modeling approaches and diagnostics to increase and measure the reliability of the identification of important features. Accuracy of a random-forest model fit on subsets of features selected as being most influential as well as clustering quality using only these features are used as a measure of effectiveness of the attribution method. Our findings indicate that the rankings of features resulting from SHAP are sensitive to the choice of architecture as well as different random initializations of weights, suggesting caution when using attribution methods on multi-view deep learning models applied to multi-omics data. We present an alternative, simple method to assess the robustness of identification of important biomolecules.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating feature attribution consistency in multi-omics deep learning models
Assessing robustness of SHAP for identifying important biomolecules
Proposing methods to improve reliability of feature importance rankings
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses SHAP for multi-omics deep learning interpretability
Compares feature rankings across different architectures
Proposes robustness assessment for important biomolecules identification
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.